Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16142479›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2005

Follow-up gliomas after radiotherapy: 1H MR spectroscopic imaging for increasing diagnostic accuracy.

Matthias Philipp Lichy, Christian Plathow, Daniela Schulz-Ertner, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Imaging of brain tumors: MR spectroscopy and metabolic imaging.Neuroimaging clinics of North America · 2010
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Functional magnetic resonance imaging for defining the biological target volume.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2006
    Review
  11. Functional brain imaging: an evidence-based analysis.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthias Philipp LichyDepartment of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany. matthias.lichy@med.uni-tuebingen.de
Christian Plathow
Daniela Schulz-Ertner
Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
University of Tübingen · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · USHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the additional benefit of proton MR spectroscopic imaging (1H SI) in patients with a new suspicious lesion after fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) of a glioma. Thirty-four patients with histologically proven astrocytoma WHO II-IV after treatment by FSRT and a new suspect lesion in the follow-up were included in this study. Data were analysed by three independent radiologists with different experience in 1H SI: Data were verified by clinical follow-up (PT, progressive tumour; nPT, non-progressive tumour) and a kappa analysis was performed. Sensitivity and specificity of T1 weighted (w) and T2w MRI was compared (imaging at radiotherapy and follow-up) using further follow-up controls as gold standard and the additional benefit of 1H SI (imaging at follow-up) was calculated. Mean interval between last irradiation and detection of a suspicious lesion was 37 +/- 32 months. Time to clinical evaluation was 13 +/- 8 months. Interobserver agreement was significantly high in all analyses (kappa always >0.8, P < 0.05). T2w imaging proved to be superior to contrast enhanced T1w imaging in sensitivity (87.5 vs 81.25%) and specificity (85.7 vs 57.1%). Solitary 1H SI had similar results as T2w (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 71.4%). Taking all techniques into account, all PT were correctly diagnosed. Radiologists' experience had no significant influence on correct interpretation of a suspicious lesion. We conclude that 1H SI is helpful in characterising new suspicious lesions in irradiated gliomas, particularly if pre-MRI is not available for evaluating follow-up.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyAdolescentAdultAgedArtifactsAstrocytomaBrain NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationSensitivity and SpecificityTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID16142479
OpenAlexW2133489282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.