ArticleNeuroradiology2005
Follow-up gliomas after radiotherapy: 1H MR spectroscopic imaging for increasing diagnostic accuracy.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accelerated water residual removal in MRS: Exploring deep learning versus fitting-based approaches.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in Neuro-Oncological Imaging: An Update on Diagnostic Approach to Brain Tumors.Cancers · 2024Review
- Magnetic resonance spectroscopic study of radiogenic changes after radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations with implications for the differential diagnosis of radionecrosis.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2013Article
- Precision radiotherapy for brain tumors: A 10-year bibliometric analysis.Neural regeneration research · 2012Article
- Comparison of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy with fluorine-18 2-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for assessment of brain tumor progression.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2012Article
- Imaging of brain tumors: MR spectroscopy and metabolic imaging.Neuroimaging clinics of North America · 2010Review
- MR imaging of late radiation therapy- and chemotherapy-induced injury: a pictorial essay.European radiology · 2009Article
- Proton MR spectroscopy of cerebral gliomas at 3 T: spatial heterogeneity, and tumour grade and extent.European radiology · 2008Article
- [MR perfusion and spectroscopic imaging in WHO grade II astrocytomas].Der Radiologe · 2007Article
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging for defining the biological target volume.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2006Review
- Functional brain imaging: an evidence-based analysis.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the additional benefit of proton MR spectroscopic imaging (1H SI) in patients with a new suspicious lesion after fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) of a glioma. Thirty-four patients with histologically proven astrocytoma WHO II-IV after treatment by FSRT and a new suspect lesion in the follow-up were included in this study. Data were analysed by three independent radiologists with different experience in 1H SI: Data were verified by clinical follow-up (PT, progressive tumour; nPT, non-progressive tumour) and a kappa analysis was performed. Sensitivity and specificity of T1 weighted (w) and T2w MRI was compared (imaging at radiotherapy and follow-up) using further follow-up controls as gold standard and the additional benefit of 1H SI (imaging at follow-up) was calculated. Mean interval between last irradiation and detection of a suspicious lesion was 37 +/- 32 months. Time to clinical evaluation was 13 +/- 8 months. Interobserver agreement was significantly high in all analyses (kappa always >0.8, P < 0.05). T2w imaging proved to be superior to contrast enhanced T1w imaging in sensitivity (87.5 vs 81.25%) and specificity (85.7 vs 57.1%). Solitary 1H SI had similar results as T2w (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 71.4%). Taking all techniques into account, all PT were correctly diagnosed. Radiologists' experience had no significant influence on correct interpretation of a suspicious lesion. We conclude that 1H SI is helpful in characterising new suspicious lesions in irradiated gliomas, particularly if pre-MRI is not available for evaluating follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.