Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16142448›Full record

ReviewDie Naturwissenschaften2005

Plant intelligence.

Anthony Trewavas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Towards the Idea of Molecular Brains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The plant body as a network of semi-autonomous agents: a review.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Senomic view of the cell: SenomeCommunicative & integrative biology · 2018
    Review
  13. How do Plants Keep their Functional Integrity?Plant signaling & behavior · 2018
    Review
  14. Predicting green: really radical (plant) predictive processing.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Ecological constraints on the origin of neurones.Journal of mathematical biology · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anthony TrewavasInstitute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JH, UK. Trewavas@ed.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intelligent behavior is a complex adaptive phenomenon that has evolved to enable organisms to deal with variable environmental circumstances. Maximizing fitness requires skill in foraging for necessary resources (food) in competitive circumstances and is probably the activity in which intelligent behavior is most easily seen. Biologists suggest that intelligence encompasses the characteristics of detailed sensory perception, information processing, learning, memory, choice, optimisation of resource sequestration with minimal outlay, self-recognition, and foresight by predictive modeling. All these properties are concerned with a capacity for problem solving in recurrent and novel situations. Here I review the evidence that individual plant species exhibit all of these intelligent behavioral capabilities but do so through phenotypic plasticity, not movement. Furthermore it is in the competitive foraging for resources that most of these intelligent attributes have been detected. Plants should therefore be regarded as prototypical intelligent organisms, a concept that has considerable consequences for investigations of whole plant communication, computation and signal transduction.

Indexed as

IntelligencePlant DevelopmentPlant Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBacterial Physiological PhenomenaEnergy MetabolismEukaryotaSignal Transduction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.