Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16140994›Full record

ArticleGenome research2005

A microarray analysis of the rice transcriptome and its comparison to Arabidopsis.

Ligeng Ma, Chen Chen, Xigang Liu, Yuling Jiao, Ning Su, Lin Li, Xiangfeng Wang, Mengliang Cao, Ning Sun, Xiuqing Zhang and 10 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Transcriptomic responses of oil palm (Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evolutionary transients in the rice transcriptome.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2010
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Ligeng MaPeking-Yale Joint Center of Plant Molecular Genetics and Agrobiotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871.
Chen Chen
Xigang Liu
Yuling Jiao
Ning Su
Lin Li
Xiangfeng Wang
Mengliang Cao
Ning Sun
Xiuqing Zhang
Jingyue Bao
Jian Li
Soren Pedersen
Lars Bolund
Hongyu Zhao
Longping Yuan
Gane Ka-Shu Wong
Jun Wang
Xing Wang Deng
Jian Wang

Funding

Analysis of a Light-Regulated Development SwitchR37GM047850 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DENG, XING WANG · 2004 to 2013
$5.7M
LIGHT SIGNAL TRANDUCTION IN ARABIDOPSISR01GM047850 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WEI, NING · 1996 to 2018
$4.1M
LIGHT SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION IN ARABIDOPSISR29GM047850 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DENG, XING WANG · 1992 to 1995
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-47850NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047850NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM047850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arabidopsis and rice are the only two model plants whose finished phase genome sequence has been completed. Here we report the construction of an oligomer microarray based on the presently known and predicted gene models in the rice genome. This microarray was used to analyze the transcriptional activity of the gene models in representative rice organ types. Expression of 86% of the 41,754 known and predicted gene models was detected. A significant fraction of these expressed gene models are organized into chromosomal regions, about 100 kb in length, that exhibit a coexpression pattern. Compared with similar genome-wide surveys of the Arabidopsis transcriptome, our results indicate that similar proportions of the two genomes are expressed in their corresponding organ types. A large percentage of the rice gene models that lack significant Arabidopsis homologs are expressed. Furthermore, the expression patterns of rice and Arabidopsis best-matched homologous genes in distinct functional groups indicate dramatic differences in their degree of conservation between the two species. Thus, this initial comparative analysis reveals some basic similarities and differences between the Arabidopsis and rice transcriptomes.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisGene Expression ProfilingGenome, PlantModels, GeneticOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOrgan SpecificityOryzaProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexSpecies SpecificityTranscription, GeneticUbiquitinProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexUbiquitin

Identifiers

PMID16140994
PMCPMC1199542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.