Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16140779›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2005

Integration targeting by avian sarcoma-leukosis virus and human immunodeficiency virus in the chicken genome.

Stephen D Barr, Jeremy Leipzig, Paul Shinn, Joe R Ecker, Frederic D Bushman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparison of Multiple Strategies for Precision Transgene Knock-In inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Assessing avian leukosis virus proviral load and lesion correlates in fowl glioma-inducing virus-infected Japanese bantam chickens.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Journal of virology · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen D BarrUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Department of Microbiology, 3610 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6076, USA.
Jeremy Leipzig
Paul Shinn
Joe R Ecker
Frederic D Bushman
University of Pennsylvania · USTorrey Pines Institute For Molecular Studies · US

Funding

Favored Sites for HIV Integration in the Human GenomeR01AI052845 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BUSHMAN, FREDERIC D · 2002 to 2017
$5.6M
MECHANISM OF HIV DNA INTEGRATIONR01AI034786 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BUSHMAN, FREDERIC D · 1993 to 2005
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS AI34786NIAID NIH HHS AI52845NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI034786NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI052845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have analyzed the placement of sites of integration of avian sarcoma-leukosis virus (ASLV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) DNA in the draft chicken genome sequence, with the goals of assessing species-specific effects on integration and allowing comparison to the distribution of chicken endogenous retroviruses (ERVs). We infected chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEF) with ASLV or HIV and sequenced 863 junctions between host and viral DNA. The relationship with cellular gene activity was analyzed by transcriptional profiling of uninfected or ASLV-infected CEF cells. ASLV weakly favored integration in active transcription units (TUs), and HIV strongly favored active TUs, trends seen previously for integration in human cells. The ERVs, in contrast, accumulated mostly outside TUs, including ERVs related to ASLV. The minority of ERVs present within TUs were mainly in the antisense orientation; consequently, the viral splicing and polyadenylation signals would not disrupt cellular mRNA synthesis. In contrast, de novo ASLV integration sites within TUs showed no orientation bias. Comparing the distribution of de novo ASLV integration sites to ERVs indicated that purifying selection against gene disruption, and not initial integration targeting, probably determined the ERV distribution. Further analysis indicated that ERVs in humans, mice, and rats showed similar distributions, suggesting purifying selection dictated their distributions as well.

Indexed as

AlpharetrovirusAnimalsBinding SitesChickensChromosomesCloning, MolecularDNAEndogenous RetrovirusesGenomeHIV-1HumansMiceMolecular Sequence DataRatsTranscription, GeneticVirus IntegrationDNA

Identifiers

PMID16140779
PMCPMC1212630
OpenAlexW2124599909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.