Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16138953›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2005

New treatment options for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Benjamin Rhee, Richard L Page

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin RheeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Robert A. Bruce Endowed Chair in Cardiovascular Research, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle 98195-6422, USA.
Richard L Page

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia requiring treatment. Its most devastating consequence is thromboembolic stroke. Therapy with warfarin is indicated in most patients, as it has been shown conclusively to reduce the risk of stroke. Aspirin is an inferior alternative except in certain low-risk patients or for patients with an absolute contraindication to warfarin. Guidelines have been published for the administration of antithrombotic therapy in AF, but many patients who are candidates for anticoagulation do not receive this therapy. Even as this therapy is under-utilized, the indication for anticoagulation is expanding. Indefinite continuation of anticoagulation should be considered in higher-risk patients despite the appearance that sinus rhythm has been restored because asymptomatic (or silent) AF occurs frequently. Newer agents that offer substantial benefit over warfarin are being developed and would enhance compliance with anticoagulation in AF if these novel therapies prove to be safe and equivalent to warfarin in efficacy.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.