ReviewCritical care (London, England)2005
Equipment review: the success of early goal-directed therapy for septic shock prompts evaluation of current approaches for monitoring the adequacy of resuscitation.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00535821 (A Multi-center Randomized Comparison of a Minimally-invasive Cardiovascular Hemodynamic Optimization), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-center Randomized Comparison of a Minimally-invasive Cardiovascular Hemodynamic Optimization (MiCHO) Protocol Versus Early Goal-Directed Therapy (EGDT) in the Management of Septic Shock Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: insights and comparisons to ProCESS, ProMISe, and ARISE.Critical care (London, England) · 2016Review
- Article
- Outcome effectiveness of the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle with addition of lactate clearance as a bundle item: a multi-national evaluation.Critical care (London, England) · 2011Article
- Cardiac index measurements by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound and transthoracic echocardiography in adult and pediatric emergency patients.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2010Article
- Choosing patient-tailored hemodynamic monitoring.Critical care (London, England) · 2010Review
- A survey of Canadian intensivists' resuscitation practices in early septic shock.Critical care (London, England) · 2007Article
- Why is early goal-directed therapy successful - is it the technology?Critical care (London, England) · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A recent trial utilizing central venous oxygen saturation (SCVO2) as a resuscitation marker in patients with sepsis has resulted in its inclusion in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. We review the evidence behind SCVO2 and its relationship to previous trials of goal-directed therapy. We compare SCVO2 to other tools for assessing the adequacy of resuscitation including physical examination, biochemical markers, pulmonary artery catheterization, esophageal Doppler, pulse contour analysis, echocardiography, pulse pressure variation, and tissue capnometry. It is unlikely that any single technology can improve outcome if isolated from an organized pattern of early recognition, algorithmic resuscitation, and frequent reassessment. This article includes a response to the journal's Health Technology Assessment questionnaire by the manufacturer of the SCVO2 catheter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.