Trial reportAnnals of surgery2005
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study.
Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03080103 (A Prospective Non-randomized Controlled, Multicenter, Multidisciplinary Trial Comparing Appendectomy and Conservative Treatment for Patients With Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 112 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Non-randomized Controlled, Multicenter, Multidisciplinary Trial Comparing Appendectomy and Conservative Treatment for Patients With Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis (the ACTUAA STUDY).
Who cites it
112 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- SAGES guidelines for the use of laparoscopy during pregnancy.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Guideline
- Aspiration versus peritoneal lavage in appendicitis: a meta-analysis.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Single-incision versus three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Pooled it
- Comparison between single-incision and conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis from eight RCTs.International journal of colorectal disease · 2013Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2012Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC gastroenterology · 2010Pooled it
- SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2010Guideline
- Appendicitis.BMJ clinical evidence · 2007Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in adults: randomized clinical trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Trial
- A new right groin incision versus McBurney's incision for open appendectomy: a randomized controlled trial.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2018Trial
- Single-port and multi-port laparoscopic left lateral liver sectionectomy for treating benign liver diseases: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.World journal of surgery · 2014Trial
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the obese patient: a subset analysis from a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Trial
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in men: a prospective randomized trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2010Trial
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison.Surgical endoscopy · 2010Trial
- Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in perforated appendicitis.World journal of surgery · 2007Trial
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a comparison of primary outcome measures.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationTrial
- Safety and Efficacy of Polymeric Clips for Appendiceal Stump Closure.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsTrial
- Appendicitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
summary background dataThe value of laparoscopy in appendicitis is not established. Studies suffer from multiple limitations. Our aim is to compare the safety and benefits of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in a prospective randomized double blind study.
methodsTwo hundred forty-seven patients were analyzed following either laparoscopic or open appendectomy. A standardized wound dressing was applied blinding both patients and independent data collectors. Surgical technique was standardized among 4 surgeons. The main outcome measures were postoperative complications. Secondary outcome measures included evaluation of pain and activity scores at base line preoperatively and on every postoperative day, as well as resumption of diet and length of stay. Activity scores and quality of life were assessed on short-term follow-up.
resultsThere was no mortality. The overall complication rate was similar in both groups (18.5% versus 17% in the laparoscopic and open groups respectively), but some early complications in the laparoscopic group required a reoperation. Operating time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (80 minutes versus 60 minutes; P = 0.000) while there was no difference in the pain scores and medications, resumption of diet, length of stay, or activity scores. At 2 weeks, there was no difference in the activity or pain scores, but physical health and general scores on the short-form 36 (SF36) quality of life assessment forms were significantly better in the laparoscopic group. Appendectomy for acute or complicated (perforated and gangrenous) appendicitis had similar complication rates, regardless of the technique (P = 0.181).
conclusionsUnlike other minimally invasive procedures, laparoscopic appendectomy did not offer a significant advantage over open appendectomy in all studied parameters except quality of life scores at 2 weeks. It also took longer to perform. The choice of the procedure should be based on surgeon or patient preference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.