ArticleAnnals of surgery2005
Carotid stenting done exclusively by vascular surgeons: first 175 cases.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2017Pooled it
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPercutaneous CAS may well replace CEA as standard of care. CAS has been performed largely by interventional cardiologists; however, with recent Food and Drug Administration approval, vascular surgeons are now hurriedly attempting to obtain the requisite endovascular skills. Reported are our 30-day and midterm outcomes of CAS.
methodsRetrospective review of 175 cervical carotid stenoses treated with elective CAS from April 2001 to February 2005. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia via percutaneous femoral access in an operating room angiosuite. Mechanical cerebral protection was used in 90% of cases. Data analysis includes demographics, procedural records, and duplex exams over a mean follow-up of 21 months.
resultsMean age is 70 years (74% men and 26% women). Preprocedural neurologic symptoms were present in 32%. Intraoperative complications included 2 seizures (1.1%) and 4 asystolic arrests (2.3%), all managed medically without sequelae. Over the 30-day follow-up there were no deaths, no myocardial infarctions (MIs), 2 major strokes (1.1%), 2 minor strokes (1.1%), 3 transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) (1.7%), and 1 major access-site complication (0.6%). At late follow-up, 3 cases (1.7%) of restenosis occurred; all were treated with repeat angioplasty and remain patent. One (0.6%) asymptomatic occlusion was detected at 6-month follow-up. There have been no late carotid-related complications or deaths.
conclusionsVascular surgeons possessing advanced catheter-based skills can safely perform CAS and achieve perioperative results comparable to CEA. Such skills are crucial to those surgeons intent on the future management of carotid occlusive disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.