Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16135917›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgery2005

Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma: accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I, an international multicenter trial.

Donald L Morton, Alistair J Cochran, John F Thompson, Robert Elashoff, Richard Essner, Edwin C Glass, Nicola Mozzillo, Omgo E Nieweg, Daniel F Roses, Harald J Hoekstra and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00671918 (A Phase 3, Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter Comparison Study of Lymphoseek® and Vital Blue Dye as Lymphoid Tissue Targeting Agents in Patients With Known Melanoma or Breast Cancer Who Are Undergoing Lymph Node Mapping), which is not on this map. Cited by 153 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00671918 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2008, after this paper: background citation

A Phase 3, Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter Comparison Study of Lymphoseek® and Vital Blue Dye as Lymphoid Tissue Targeting Agents in Patients With Known Melanoma or Breast Cancer Who Are Undergoing Lymph Node Mapping

TypeinterventionalSponsorNavidea BiopharmaceuticalsRan2008 to 2009Enrolled186ConditionsBreast Cancer, MelanomaArmsLymphoseek
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 716 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Gene variants in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis and cutaneous melanoma progression.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2013
    Pooled it
  6. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology joint clinical practice guideline.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2012
    Guideline
  7. Dramatic innovations in modern surgical subspecialties.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2010
    Pooled it
  8. EANM-EORTC general recommendations for sentinel node diagnostics in melanoma.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2009
    Guideline
  9. Malignant melanoma (non-metastatic).BMJ clinical evidence · 2007
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Donald L MortonJohn Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA.
Alistair J Cochran
John F Thompson
Robert Elashoff
Richard Essner
Edwin C Glass
Nicola Mozzillo
Omgo E Nieweg
Daniel F Roses
Harald J Hoekstra
Constantine P Karakousis
Douglas S Reintgen
Brendon J Coventry
He-jing Wang
Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial Group
Saint John's Health Center · USIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITMelanoma Institute Australia · AUMillard Fillmore Suburban Hospital · USNew York University · USOncode Institute · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

SURGICAL ONCOLOGY WITH COMBINATION THERMO-CHEMOTHERAPYP01CA029605 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI COCHRAN, ALISTAIR JOHN · 1985 to 2013
$75.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA 29605NCI NIH HHS P01 CA029605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate, in an international multicenter phase III trial, the accuracy, use, and morbidity of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy (LM/SNB) for staging the regional nodal basin of patients with early-stage melanoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Since our introduction of LM/SNB in 1990, this technique has been widely adopted and has become part of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Eleven years ago, the authors began the international Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-I) to compare 2 treatment approaches: wide excision (WE) plus LM/SNB with immediate complete lymphadenectomy (CLND) for sentinel node (SN) metastases, and WE plus postoperative observation with CLND delayed until the subsequent development of clinically evident nodal metastases.

methodsAfter each center achieved 85% accuracy of SN identification during a 30-case learning phase, patients with primary cutaneous melanoma (> or =1 mm with Clark level > or =III, or any thickness with Clark level > or =IV) were randomly assigned in a 4:6 ratio to WE plus observation (WEO) with delayed CLND for nodal recurrence, or to WE plus LM/SNB with immediate CLND for SN metastasis. The accuracy of LM/SNB was determined by comparing the rates of SN identification and the incidence of SN metastases in the LM/SNB group versus the subsequent development of nodal metastases in the regional nodal basin of those patients with tumor-negative SNs. Early morbidity of LM/SNB was evaluated by comparing complication rates between the 2 treatment groups. Trial accrual was completed on March 31, 2002, after enrollment of 2001 patients.

resultsInitial SN identification rate was 95.3% overall: 99.3% for the groin, 95.3% for the axilla, and 84.5% for the neck basins. The rate of false-negative LM/SNB during the trial phase, as measured by nodal recurrence in a tumor-negative dissected SN basin, decreased with increasing case volume at each center: 10.3% for the first 25 cases versus 5.2% after 25 cases. There were no operative mortalities. The low (10.1%) complication rate after LM/SNB increased to 37.2% with the addition of CLND; CLND also increased the severity of complications.

conclusionsLM/SNB is a safe, low-morbidity procedure for staging the regional nodal basin in early melanoma. Even after a 30-case learning phase and 25 additional LM/SNB cases, the accuracy of LM/SNB continues to increase with a center's experience. LM/SNB should become standard care for staging the regional lymph nodes of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingSentinel Lymph Node BiopsySkin NeoplasmsSurgical Procedures, Operative

Identifiers

PMID16135917
PMCPMC1357739
OpenAlexW2096333298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.