Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16133320›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2005

Microsatellite marker polymorphism and mapping in pea (Pisum sativum L.).

K Loridon, K McPhee, J Morin, P Dubreuil, M L Pilet-Nayel, G Aubert, C Rameau, A Baranger, C Coyne, I Lejeune-Hènaut and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 259 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Fine mapping and identification of a Fusarium wilt resistance gene FwS1 in pea.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rust (Genes · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Characterizations of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

K LoridonINRA URLEG, Domaine d'Epoisses, 21110 Bretenières, France.
K McPhee
J Morin
P Dubreuil
M L Pilet-Nayel
G Aubert
C Rameau
A Baranger
C Coyne
I Lejeune-Hènaut
J Burstin
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique · MAInstitut de Génétique, Environnement et Protection des Plantes · FRAgricultural Research Service · USWashington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper aims at providing reliable and cost effective genotyping conditions, level of polymorphism in a range of genotypes and map position of newly developed microsatellite markers in order to promote broad application of these markers as a common set for genetic studies in pea. Optimal PCR conditions were determined for 340 microsatellite markers based on amplification in eight genotypes. Levels of polymorphism were determined for 309 of these markers. Compared to data obtained for other species, levels of polymorphism detected in a panel of eight genotypes were high with a mean number of 3.8 alleles per polymorphic locus and an average PIC value of 0.62, indicating that pea represents a rather polymorphic autogamous species. One of our main objectives was to locate a maximum number of microsatellite markers on the pea genetic map. Data obtained from three different crosses were used to build a composite genetic map of 1,430 cM (Haldane) comprising 239 microsatellite markers. These include 216 anonymous SSRs developed from enriched genomic libraries and 13 SSRs located in genes. The markers are quite evenly distributed throughout the seven linkage groups of the map, with 85% of intervals between the adjacent SSR markers being smaller than 10 cM. There was a good conservation of marker order and linkage group assignment across the three populations. In conclusion, we hope this report will promote wide application of these markers and will allow information obtained by different laboratories worldwide in diverse fields of pea genetics, such as QTL mapping studies and genetic resource surveys, to be easily aligned.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingPolymorphism, GeneticMicrosatellite RepeatsPisum sativumRandom Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique

Identifiers

PMID16133320
OpenAlexW2043290472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.