Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16132939›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2005

[Critical reevaluation of cyclooxygenase two inhibitors in perioperative pain therapy].

A Brack, H L Rittner, M Schäfer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

A BrackKlinik für Anaesthesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Charité -- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin. alexander.brack@charite.de
H L Rittner
M Schäfer
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant increase in thromboembolic events (i.e. myocardial infarction and stroke) was demonstrated in multicenter studies after several months of treatment with cyclooxygenase 2 (cox-2) inhibitors. In February 2005, the European medical agencies (EMEA) substantially increased the number of contraindications for all cox-2 inhibitors. They are now contraindicated for patients with coronary artery disease. Furthermore, 2 out of 6 cox-2 inhibitors have been withdrawn from the market. In this review, the current state of knowledge on the use of cox-2 inhibitors in perioperative pain therapy is summarized: i) they are equally as potent as other non-opioid analgesics, ii) they decrease opioid consumption, iii) a reduction in postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been adequately demonstrated. Regarding side-effects, it can be concluded that i) the incidence of thromboembolic events is increased in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, ii) perioperative blood loss is not affected, iii) ulcer formation is not promoted, iv) the risk for acute renal failure is probably increased to the same extent as for NSAIDs and v) severe bronchospasm can be triggered in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Indexed as

ContraindicationsCoronary DiseaseCyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsHumansPainPostoperative PainCyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID16132939
OpenAlexW2602939252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.