Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16132822›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2005

Probabilistic Identification of Spin Systems and their Assignments including Coil-Helix Inference as Output (PISTACHIO).

Hamid R Eghbalnia, Arash Bahrami, Liya Wang, Amir Assadi, John L Markley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Signaling through dynamic linkers as revealed by PKA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Advances in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance for Drug Discovery.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2009
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Center for Eukaryotic Structural Genomics.Journal of structural and functional genomics · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hamid R EghbalniaBiochemistry Department, National Magnetic Resonance Facility at Madison, 433, Babcock Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA. eghbalni@nmrfam.wisc.edu
Arash Bahrami
Liya Wang
Amir Assadi
John L Markley

Funding

Center for Eukaryotic Structural GenomicsP50GM064598 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI MARKLEY, JOHN L · 2001 to 2004
$23.7M
WATER DISTRIB:PHYSICAL PROPERT:PIZZA &LMPS MOZZARELLA CHEESES:EARLY STAGE MATURP41RR002301 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KEUTSCH, FRANK · 1985 to 2011
$13.0M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR02301NIGMS NIH HHS 1 P50 GM64598NLM NIH HHS 5T15LM005359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a novel automated strategy (PISTACHIO) for the probabilistic assignment of backbone and sidechain chemical shifts in proteins. The algorithm uses peak lists derived from various NMR experiments as input and provides as output ranked lists of assignments for all signals recognized in the input data as constituting spin systems. PISTACHIO was evaluated by comparing its performance with raw peak-picked data from 15 proteins ranging from 54 to 300 residues; the results were compared with those achieved by experts analyzing the same datasets by hand. As scored against the best available independent assignments for these proteins, the first-ranked PISTACHIO assignments were 80-100% correct for backbone signals and 75-95% correct for sidechain signals. The independent assignments benefited, in a number of cases, from structural data (e.g. from NOESY spectra) that were unavailable to PISTACHIO. Any number of datasets in any combination can serve as input. Thus PISTACHIO can be used as datasets are collected to ascertain the current extent of secure assignments, to identify residues with low assignment probability, and to suggest the types of additional data needed to remove ambiguities. The current implementation of PISTACHIO, which is available from a server on the Internet, supports input data from 15 standard double- and triple-resonance experiments. The software can readily accommodate additional types of experiments, including data from selectively labeled samples. The assignment probabilities can be carried forward and refined in subsequent steps leading to a structure. The performance of PISTACHIO showed no direct dependence on protein size, but correlated instead with data quality (completeness and signal-to-noise). PISTACHIO represents one component of a comprehensive probabilistic approach we are developing for the collection and analysis of protein NMR data.

Indexed as

Protein Structure, SecondaryAlgorithmsAutomationMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, StatisticalModels, TheoreticalProbabilityProteinsProteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.