Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16132577›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2005

Chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression in breast cancer as a potential predictive marker of isolated tumor cells in bone marrow.

Neslihan Cabioglu, Aysegul Sahin, Michele Doucet, Ekrem Yavuz, Abdullah Igci, Engin O Yildirim, Esin Aktas, Sema Bilgic, Bayram Kiran, Gunnur Deniz and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Chemokine receptor Cxcr4 contributes to kidney fibrosis via multiple effectors.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Neslihan CabiogluDepartment of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 85, Houston, TX 77030, USA. neslicab@yahoo.com
Aysegul Sahin
Michele Doucet
Ekrem Yavuz
Abdullah Igci
Engin O Yildirim
Esin Aktas
Sema Bilgic
Bayram Kiran
Gunnur Deniz
Janet E Price
Istanbul University · TRThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA 16672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions between the CXCR4 chemokine receptor in breast cancer cells and the ligand CXCL12/SDF-1alpha are thought to play an important role in breast cancer metastases. In this pilot study, CXCR4 expression along with other biomarkers including HER2-neu and EGFR, were measured in primary tumor samples of patients with operable breast cancer to test whether any of these biomarkers alone and in combination could indicate breast cancer with high likelihood of metastasizing to bone marrow. Cytokeratin (CK) positive cells in bone marrow were identified by flow-cytometry following enrichment with CK 7/8 antibody-coupled magnetic beads. Primary tumors (n = 18) were stained with specific antibodies for CXCR4, HER2-neu, EGFR, and PCNA using an indirect avidin-biotin horseradish peroxidase method. The majority of the patients had T2/T3 tumors (72%), or lymph node involvement (67%) as pathologic characteristics that were more indicative of high-risk breast cancer. High CXCR4 cytoplasmic expression was found in 7 of 18 patients (39%), whereas 6 of 18 patients (33%) were found to have CK positivity in bone marrow. The median number of CK(+) cells was 236 (range, 20-847) per 5 x 10(4) enriched BM cells. The presence of CK(+) cells in bone marrow was found to be associated with increased expression of CXCR4 alone or in addition to EGFR and/or HER2-neu expression (P = 0.013, P = 0.005, and P = 0.025, respectively) in primary tumors. Furthermore, three patients with high CK positivity (>236 CK(+) per 5 x 10(4) enriched bone marrow cells) in bone marrow exclusively expressed high levels of CXCR4 with EGFR/HER2-neu (P = 0.001). Our data suggest that high CXCR4 expression in breast cancer may be a potential marker in predicting isolated tumor cells in bone marrow. CXCR4 coexpression with EGFR/HER2-neu might further predict a particular subset of patients with high CK positivity in bone marrow.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBone Marrow NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsCytoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansKeratinsMiddle AgedPrognosisReceptors, CXCR4Biomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsKeratinsReceptors, CXCR4

Identifiers

PMID16132577
OpenAlexW2048835394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.