ArticlePLoS genetics2005
Comparative and evolutionary analysis of the bacterial homologous recombination systems.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 189 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
189 citing papers in PubMed, 340 citations in OpenAlex.
- Should I stay or should I go? DNA damage thresholds drive stay-or-go decisions inJournal of bacteriology · 2026Review
- Horizontal Gene Transfer inBiology · 2026Review
- A global metagenomic atlas of aging identifies a microbiota phase transition associated with disease risk.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Article
- Article
- Novel genes arise from genomic deletions across the bacterial tree of life.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Cancer mutations in RAD51 and its paralogues.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Modulators of gene amplification alter evolution of antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Chromosomal Curing Drives an Arms Race Between Bacterial Transformation and Prophage.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Conservation and divergence of ciprofloxacin persister survival mechanisms between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Genome-wide antibiotic-CRISPRi profiling identifies LiaR activation as a strategy to resensitize fluoroquinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Bacterial RecD2 is a processive single-stranded DNA translocase with strand-switching capacity at DNA forks.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Comprehensive profiling of integrative conjugative elements (ICEs) in Mollicutes: distinct catalysts of gene flow and genome shaping.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Review
- Characterization of the genome editing with miniature DNA nucleases TnpB and IscB in Escherichia coli strains.Communications biology · 2025Article
- A comparative genomic and phenotypic study ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2024Article
- Phylogenetic incongruence in an Asiatic species complex of the genus Caryodaphnopsis (Lauraceae).BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Intracellular delivery of oncolytic viruses with engineered Salmonella causes viral replication and cell death.iScience · 2024Article
- Differential requirement for RecFOR pathway components in Thermus thermophilus.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Article
- Article
129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Homologous recombination is a housekeeping process involved in the maintenance of chromosome integrity and generation of genetic variability. Although detailed biochemical studies have described the mechanism of action of its components in model organisms, there is no recent extensive assessment of this knowledge, using comparative genomics and taking advantage of available experimental data on recombination. Using comparative genomics, we assessed the diversity of recombination processes among bacteria, and simulations suggest that we missed very few homologs. The work included the identification of orthologs and the analysis of their evolutionary history and genomic context. Some genes, for proteins such as RecA, the resolvases, and RecR, were found to be nearly ubiquitous, suggesting that the large majority of bacterial genomes are capable of homologous recombination. Yet many genomes show incomplete sets of presynaptic systems, with RecFOR being more frequent than RecBCD/AddAB. There is a significant pattern of co-occurrence between these systems and antirecombinant proteins such as the ones of mismatch repair and SbcB, but no significant association with nonhomologous end joining, which seems rare in bacteria. Surprisingly, a large number of genomes in which homologous recombination has been reported lack many of the enzymes involved in the presynaptic systems. The lack of obvious correlation between the presence of characterized presynaptic genes and experimental data on the frequency of recombination suggests the existence of still-unknown presynaptic mechanisms in bacteria. It also indicates that, at the moment, the assessment of the intrinsic stability or recombination isolation of bacteria in most cases cannot be inferred from the identification of known recombination proteins in the genomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.