Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16131591›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2005

An in vitro RNA editing system from cauliflower mitochondria: editing site recognition parameters can vary in different plant species.

Julia Neuwirt, Mizuki Takenaka, Johannes A van der Merwe, Axel Brennicke

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An RNA recognition motif-containing protein is required for plastid RNA editing in Arabidopsis and maize.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Multiple organellar RNA editing factor (MORF) family proteins are required for RNA editing in mitochondria and plastids of plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
  12. When you can't trust the DNA: RNA editing changes transcript sequences.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2011
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia NeuwirtMolekulare Botanik, Universität Ulm, 89069 Ulm, Germany.
Mizuki Takenaka
Johannes A van der Merwe
Axel Brennicke
Universität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the 400 RNA editing sites in flowering plant mitochondria are found in mRNAs. Consequently, the sequence vicinities of homologous sites are highly conserved between different species and are presumably recognized by likewise conserved trans-factors. To investigate the evolutionary adaptation to sequence variation, we have now analyzed the recognition elements of an editing site with divergent upstream sequences in the two species pea and cauliflower. This variation is tolerated at the site selected, because the upstream cis-elements reach into the 5'-UTR of the mRNA. To compare cis-recognition features in pea and cauliflower mitochondria, we developed a new in vitro RNA editing system for cauliflower. In vitro editing assays with deleted and mutated template RNAs show that the major recognition elements for both species are located within the conserved sequence. In cauliflower, however, the essential upstream nucleotides extend further upstream than they do in pea. In-depth analysis of single-nucleotide mutations reveals critical spacing of the editing site and the specific recognition elements, and shows that the +1 nucleotide identity is important in cauliflower, but not in pea.

Indexed as

RNA Editing5' Untranslated RegionsArabidopsis ProteinsBase SequenceBrassicaCell ExtractsCell-Free SystemConserved SequenceEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationIn Vitro TechniquesMitochondrial Proton-Translocating ATPasesMolecular Sequence DataPisum sativumPoint MutationRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid5' Untranslated RegionsArabidopsis ProteinsATP9 protein, ArabidopsisCell ExtractsMitochondrial Proton-Translocating ATPasesRNARNA, MitochondrialRNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID16131591
PMCPMC1370840
OpenAlexW2119427238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.