Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16131555›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ethics2005

Balancing confidentiality and the information provided to families of patients in primary care.

M D Pérez-Cárceles, J E Pereñiguez, E Osuna, A Luna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ethics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The risks of absolute medical confidentiality.Science and engineering ethics · 2013
    Article
  7. Elderly patients also have rights.Journal of medical ethics · 2007
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M D Pérez-CárcelesDepartment of Legal and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Murcia, E-30100 Espinardo, Murcia, Spain. mdperez@um.es
J E Pereñiguez
E Osuna
A Luna

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical confidentiality underpins the doctor-patient relationship and ensures privacy so that intimate information can be exchanged to improve, preserve, and protect the health of the patient. The right to information applies to the patient alone, and, only if expressly desired, can it be extended to family members. However, it must be remembered that one of the primary tenets of family medicine is precisely that patient care occurs ideally within the context of the family. There may be, then, certain occasions when difficulties will arise as to the extent of the information provided to family members.

objectivesThis study aimed to describe family doctors' attitudes to confidentiality and providing patient information to relatives as well as their justifications for sharing information.

methodA descriptive postal questionnaire was self-administered by family doctors.

resultsOf 227 doctors, 95.1% provided information to a patient's family and over a third (35%) disclosed information to others without prior patient consent.

conclusionsThe findings reveal that family doctors should pay more attention to their patients' rights to information, privacy, and confidentiality, and reflect very carefully on the fine balance between this and the occasional need for the support and collaboration of family members in delivery of care. Emphasis should be placed on ethics and legal problems during undergraduate education and in-service training of doctors.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEthics, MedicalChi-Square DistributionConfidentialityCross-Sectional StudiesDisclosureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysicians, FamilyRural PopulationSpainWorkloadEmpirical ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

Identifiers

PMID16131555
PMCPMC1734221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.