Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16131532›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2006

Can all neonatal resuscitation be managed by nurse practitioners?

L C Chan, E Hey

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The amount of supervision trainees receive during neonatal resuscitation is variable and often dependent on subjective criteria.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Article
  2. A survey of the current neonatal nurse practitioner workforce.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L C ChanMaternity Unit, Wansbeck Hospital, Ashington, Northumberland, UK. lai.chan@northumbria-healthcare.nhs.uk
E Hey
National Health Service · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the ability of nurse practitioners to manage the care of all babies requiring resuscitation at birth in a unit without on site medical assistance.

methodA prospective review, and selective external audit, of the case records of all 14 572 babies born in a maternity unit in the north of England during the first eight years after nurse practitioners replaced resident paediatric staff in 1996.

resultsEvery non-malformed baby with an audible heart beat at the start of delivery was successfully resuscitated. Twenty term babies and 41 preterm babies were intubated at birth. Eight term babies only responded after acidosis or hypovolaemia was corrected following umbilical vein catheterisation; in each case the catheter was in place within six minutes of birth. Early grade 2-3 neonatal encephalopathy occurred with much the same frequency (0.12%) as in other recent studies. Independent external cross validated review found no case of substandard care during the first hour of life.

conclusionThe practitioners successfully managed all the problems coming their way from the time of appointment. There was no evidence that their skill decreased over time even though, on average, they only found themselves undertaking laryngeal intubation once a year. It remains to be shown that this level of competence can be replicated in other settings.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceApneaBrain DiseasesHospital MortalityHumansHypovolemiaInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesIntubation, IntratrachealNeonatal NursingNurse PractitionersNursing AuditResuscitationStillbirth

Identifiers

PMID16131532
PMCPMC2672652
OpenAlexW2092189356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.