Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16127144›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of pathology2005

Macrophage responses to hypoxia: implications for tumor progression and anti-cancer therapies.

Claire Lewis, Craig Murdoch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of pathology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 170 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
170citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

170 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Myeloid metabolism and its role in immunotherapy of cancer.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Tumor-Associated Macrophage in Breast Tumor Microenvironment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The VEGF-Hypoxia Signature Is Upregulated in Basal-like Breast Tumors from Women of African Ancestry and Associated with Poor Outcomes in Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claire LewisTumor Targeting Group, Academic Unit of Pathology, Division of Genomic Medicine, Sir Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Medical Research, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK. claire.lewis@sheffield.ac.uk
Craig Murdoch

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of multiple areas of hypoxia (low oxygen tension) is a hallmark feature of human and experimental tumors. Monocytes are continually recruited into tumors, differentiate into tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and then accumulate in these hypoxic areas. A number of recent studies have shown that macrophages respond to the levels of hypoxia found in tumors by up-regulating such transcription factors as hypoxia-inducible factors 1 and 2, which in turn activate a broad array of mitogenic, pro-invasive, pro-angiogenic, and pro-metastatic genes. This could explain why high numbers of TAMs correlate with poor prognosis in various forms of cancer. In this review, we assess the evidence for hypoxia activating a distinct, pro-tumor phenotype in macrophages and the possible effect of this on the growth, invasion, angiogenesis, and immune evasion of tumors. We also discuss current attempts to selectively target TAMs for destruction or to use them to deliver gene therapy specifically to hypoxic tumor sites.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease ProgressionHumansHypoxiaMacrophagesNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID16127144
PMCPMC1698733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.