Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16127037›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2005

Risk factors for acquisition of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing SPM metallo-beta-lactamase.

Simone Aranha Nouér, Marcio Nucci, Márcia P de-Oliveira, Flávia Lúcia Piffano Costa Pellegrino, Beatriz Meurer Moreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Lytic activity of F8-like phage φSPM-1 against One Health lineages of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Study of Antibiotic Resistant Genes inArchives of Razi Institute · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Trends and correlation of antibacterial usage and bacterial resistance: time series analysis for antibacterial stewardship in a Chinese teaching hospital (2009-2013).European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simone Aranha NouérHospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro CEP 21941-590, Brazil.
Marcio Nucci
Márcia P de-Oliveira
Flávia Lúcia Piffano Costa Pellegrino
Beatriz Meurer Moreira

Funding

Emerging drug-resistant infectionsD43TW006563 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI RILEY, LEE W · 2003 to 2012
$1.6M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW006563FIC NIH HHS TW006563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate risk factors for colonization or infection due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPa) carrying the bla(SPM) gene (SPM-MRDPa) among hospitalized patients, we undertook a case control study at a 480-bed, tertiary-care university hospital. Two different case definitions were used. In the first definition, a case patient (SPM case patient) was defined as a patient who had at least one isolate of SPM-MDRPa (14 patients). In the second, a case patient (non-SPM case patient) was defined as a patient who had at least one isolate of non-SPM-MDRPa (18 patients). For each case patient, we selected two controls, defined as a patient colonized and/or infected by a non-MDRPa isolate during the same study period and with the closest duration of hospitalization until the isolation of P. aeruginosa as cases. The use of quinolones was the single independent predictor of colonization and/or infection by bla(SPM) MDRPa (odds ratio [OR] = 14.70, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.70 to 127.34, P = 0.01), whereas the use of cefepime was the single predictor of colonization and/or infection by non-bla(SPM) MDRPa (OR = 8.50, 95% CI = 1.51 to 47.96, P = 0.01). The main risk factor for MDRPa was a history of antibiotics usage. Stratification of risk factor analysis by a precise mechanism of resistance led us to identify a specific antibiotic, a quinolone, as a predictor for SPM-MDRPa.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesChildCross InfectionDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamasesbeta-lactamase SPM-1, Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID16127037
PMCPMC1195411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.