ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2005
Comparative phylogenomics of pathogenic bacteria by microarray analysis.
Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic Insights Into Multidrug-Resistant FoodborneInternational journal of food science · 2026Article
- Microsatellites in Pursuit of Microbial Genome Evolution.Frontiers in microbiology · 2015Review
- A beginner's guide to phylogenetics.Microbial ecology · 2013Review
- Closely related Campylobacter jejuni strains from different sources reveal a generalist rather than a specialist lifestyle.BMC genomics · 2011Article
- Array CGH phylogeny: how accurate are comparative genomic hybridization-based trees?BMC genomics · 2011Article
- Array Comparative Genomic Hybridizations: assessing the ability to recapture evolutionary relationships using an in silico approach.BMC genomics · 2011Article
- Genomic variations define divergence of water/wildlife-associated Campylobacter jejuni niche specialists from common clonal complexes.Environmental microbiology · 2011Article
- Article
- High-throughput microarray technology in diagnostics of enterobacteria based on genome-wide probe selection and regression analysis.BMC genomics · 2010Article
- Evaluation of one- and two-color gene expression arrays for microbial comparative genome hybridization analyses in routine applications.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2010Article
- Article
- Changes in the genomic content of circulating Bordetella pertussis strains isolated from the Netherlands, Sweden, Japan and Australia: adaptive evolution or drift?BMC genomics · 2010Article
- Genomics-based molecular epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from feedlot cattle and from people in Alberta, Canada.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2009Article
- Applications of microarrays in pathogen detection and biodefence.Trends in biotechnology · 2009Review
- Comparative genomic characterization of citrus-associated Xylella fastidiosa strains.BMC genomics · 2007Article
- Comparative genomic hybridizations reveal absence of large Streptomyces coelicolor genomic islands in Streptomyces lividans.BMC genomics · 2007Article
- Use of suppression subtractive hybridisation to extend our knowledge of genome diversity in Campylobacter jejuni.BMC genomics · 2007Article
- Bacillus subtilis genome diversity.Journal of bacteriology · 2007Article
- Characterization of probiotic Escherichia coli isolates with a novel pan-genome microarray.Genome biology · 2007Article
- Comparative phylogenomics of Clostridium difficile reveals clade specificity and microevolution of hypervirulent strains.Journal of bacteriology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA microarrays represent a powerful technology that enables whole-scale comparison of bacterial genomes. This, coupled with new methods to model DNA microarray data, is facilitating the development of robust comparative phylogenomics analyses. Such studies have dramatically increased our ability to differentiate between bacteria, highlighting previously undetected genetic differences and population structures and providing new insight into virulence and evolution of bacterial pathogens. Recent results from such studies have generated insights into the evolution of bacterial pathogens, the levels of diversity and plasticity in the genome of a species, as well as the differences in virulence amongst pathogenic bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.