Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16124874›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2005

Signs and symptoms in children with a serious infection: a qualitative study.

Ann Van den Bruel, Rudi Bruyninckx, Etienne Vermeire, Peter Aerssens, Bert Aertgeerts, Frank Buntinx

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02024282 (Validation of a Vital Signs and Symptoms Decision Tree and the Effect of a Point-of- Care CRP Test, Oxygen Saturation, a Brief Intervention and a Parent Leaflet on Diagnosing, Antibiotic Prescribing Rate and Parental Satisfaction in Acutely Ill Children in Primary Care."), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02024282 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Validation of a Vital Signs and Symptoms Decision Tree and the Effect of a Point-of- Care CRP Test, Oxygen Saturation, a Brief Intervention and a Parent Leaflet on Diagnosing, Antibiotic Prescribing Rate and Parental Satisfaction in Acutely Ill Children in Primary Care."

TypeinterventionalSponsorKU LeuvenRan2013 to 2014Enrolled8,962ConditionsSepsis, Bacteraemia, Meningitis, AbscessArmsUse of C-reactive protein (CRP) point of care test, Brief intervention and parent leaflet, Finger Pulse Oximeter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Physicians' appraisal of parental concerns: a qualitative assessment.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Which early 'red flag' symptoms identify children with meningococcal disease in primary care?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
  15. Using vital signs to assess children with acute infections: a survey of current practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
  16. Signs and symptoms for diagnosis of serious infections in children: a prospective study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ann Van den BruelDepartment of General Practice, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. ann.vandenbruel@med.kuleuven.ac.be
Rudi Bruyninckx
Etienne Vermeire
Peter Aerssens
Bert Aertgeerts
Frank Buntinx
KU Leuven · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly diagnosis of serious infections in children is difficult in general practice, as incidence is low, patients present themselves at an early stage of the disease and diagnostic tools are limited to signs and symptoms from observation, clinical history and physical examination. Little is known which signs and symptoms are important in general practice. With this qualitative study, we aimed to identify possible new important diagnostic variables.

methodsSemi-structured interviews with parents and physicians of children with a serious infection. We investigated all signs and symptoms that were related to or preceded the diagnosis. The analysis was done according to the grounded theory approach. Participants were recruited in general practice and at the hospital.

results18 children who were hospitalised because of a serious infection were included. On average, parents and paediatricians were interviewed 3 days after admittance of the child to hospital, general practitioners between 5 and 8 days after the initial contact. The most prominent diagnostic signs in seriously ill children were changed behaviour, crying characteristics and the parents' opinion. Children either behaved drowsy or irritable and cried differently, either moaning or an inconsolable, loud crying. The parents found this illness different from previous illnesses, because of the seriousness or duration of the symptoms, or the occurrence of a critical incident. Classical signs, like high fever, petechiae or abnormalities at auscultation were helpful for the diagnosis when they were present, but not helpful when they were absent.

conclusionbehavioural signs and symptoms were very prominent in children with a serious infection. They will be further assessed for diagnostic accuracy in a subsequent, quantitative diagnostic study.

Indexed as

ParentsBelgiumChildChild BehaviorChild, HospitalizedChild, PreschoolCryingFamily PracticeFeverHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfectionsInterviews as TopicIrritable MoodPediatrics

Identifiers

PMID16124874
PMCPMC1215482
OpenAlexW1809980032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.