Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16123805›Full record

ReviewOncogene2005

TGF-beta, neuronal stem cells and glioblastoma.

Nady Golestaneh, Bibhuti Mishra

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Role of Neurodevelopmental Pathways in Brain Tumors.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. A highlight on Sonic hedgehog pathway.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nady GolestanehSchool of Medicine, Georgetown University, 3900 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Bibhuti Mishra
Georgetown University · US

Funding

NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK58637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) signaling leads to a number of biological end points involving cell growth, differentiation, and morphogenesis. Typically, the cellular effect accompanies an induction of mesodermal cell fate and inhibition of neural cell differentiation. However, during pathological conditions, these defined effects of TGF-beta can be reversed; for example, the growth-inhibitory effect is replaced with its tumor promoting ability. A multitude of factors and cross-signaling pathways have been reported to be involved in modulating the dual effects of TGF-beta. In this review, we focus on the potential role of TGF-beta signal transduction during development of neural progenitor cells and its relation to glioblastoma development from neural stem cells.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationGlioblastomaHumansMAP Kinase Signaling SystemNeuronsSignal TransductionSpectrinStem CellsTransforming Growth Factor betaSpectrinTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID16123805
OpenAlexW2006862425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.