ArticleJournal of medical virology2005
Rapid and sensitive detection of multiple genes from the SARS-coronavirus using quantitative RT-PCR with dual systems.
Article in Journal of medical virology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of the direct quantitation of SARS-CoV-2 by droplet digital PCR.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Influence of Different Inactivation Methods on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 RNA Copy Number.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2020Article
- Laboratory testing of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 (2019-nCoV): Current status, challenges, and countermeasures.Reviews in medical virology · 2020Review
- Recent advances in lab-on-a-chip technologies for viral diagnosis.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2020Review
- The pathology and pathogenesis of experimental severe acute respiratory syndrome and influenza in animal models.Journal of comparative pathology · 2014Review
- Immunoreactivity characterisation of the three structural regions of the human coronavirus OC43 nucleocapsid protein by Western blot: implications for the diagnosis of coronavirus infection.Journal of virological methods · 2013Article
- Preparation and characterization of a novel monoclonal antibody specific to severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus nucleocapsid protein.Virus research · 2006Article
- Detection and monitoring of virus infections by real-time PCR.Molecular aspects of medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) was caused by a newly identified coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in 2003. To detect early SARS-CoV infection, a one-step, real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay was developed that could simultaneously detect nucleocapsid (N), membrane (M), and spike (S) genes of SARS-CoV with the same PCR condition using either Applied Biosystems (ABI) Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System or Roche LightCycler. The sensitivity of this assay was evaluated using cell culture-derived viruses, in vitro transcribed viral RNA, and clinical specimens. The SARS-S, -M, and -N primer/probe sets described in this paper could detect one to ten copies of in vitro transcribed S, M, and N RNA per test using both the ABI and Roche assay systems. The relative sensitivities for detecting cell culture-derived SARS-CoV were 0.01, 0.01, and 0.001 PFU/test, respectively. It showed that SARS-N has comparable detection efficiencies to SARS2 and SARS3 which are primers sets designed by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In addition, SARS-S and SARS-M also demonstrated equivalent sensitivity to the commercially available RealArt HPA-Coronavirus reagents (Artus). The relative sensitivity of these primer/probe sets was also examined using human sera spiked viruses and clinical specimens from four confirmed SARS patients. Similar results as above were obtained. Specificity tests and sequence alignment showed that these primer/probe sets annealed perfectly to 31 isolates of SARS-CoV; and there was no cross detection with other coronaviruses and human respiratory tract-associated viruses. Therefore, not only is it compatible with the ABI and Roche systems, this multiple-gene detection assay also has the merit of being a rapid, safe, sensitive, and specific tool for accurate diagnosis of SARS-CoV infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.