ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2005
Antihypertensive drug prescribing in Grampian.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physician adherence to hypertension treatment guidelines and drug acquisition costs of antihypertensive drugs at the cardiac clinic: a pilot study.Patient preference and adherence · 2012Article
- Prescribing pattern of antihypertensive drugs in a general hospital in central China.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2011Article
- Choice of first antihypertensive--are existing guidelines ignored?British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo assess the cost implications of changing prescribing patterns for antihypertensive drugs and to analyse adherence to guidelines and formulary in Grampian region over a 1 year period.
methodsData on all prescriptions for antihypertensive medicines between November 2001 and October 2002 were obtained from Grampian Health Board. The total quantity and cost of each drug prescribed was calculated and compared with November 1998 to October 1999. Adherence to the local formulary and 1999 British Hypertension Society guidelines for first line agents and prescribing of generic drug names were analyzed for each practice.
resultsThere was an increase in the total number of prescriptions for antihypertensive drugs from 504929 in 1998/99 to 741620 in 2001/02, and a corresponding increase in total cost from pound 4.52 million to pound 6.79 million. Increases were seen in all drug classes, particularly angiotensin II antagonists (246.27%). Adherence to the local formulary was good, with an average of 91.25% (SD 5.94%) of prescribing consistent with recommended agents. This fell to 71.70% (SD 23.10%) for angiotensin II antagonists. Prescription using generic name was related to whether the practice dispensed medication or not: the mean level of generic prescribing in dispensing practices was 75.25% and in nondispensing practices was 89.02% (mean difference 13.76 (9.27, 18.26), P < 0.001).
conclusionsThere was a substantial increase in prescribing volume and cost of antihypertensives between 1998/99 and 2001/02. This trend is likely to have continued, given changing targets and indications for therapy. Although practices generally showed high concordance with formulary recommendations, newer agents such as angiotensin II antagonists were less consistent, possibly related to pharmaceutical influences on prescribing. Dispensing practices were more likely to prescribe branded drugs which may reflect current reimbursement policies. Changing prescribing practices by encouraging formulary based prescribing and prescribing of generic agents may help offset the cost implications of guideline driven increases in antihypertensive drug prescribing. Education, and reviewing payment practices in dispensing and smaller practices, may also have a role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.