Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16120068›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2005

Therapeutic drug monitoring of atazanavir: surveillance of pharmacotherapy in the clinic.

John E Ray, Debbie Marriott, Mark T Bloch, Andrew J McLachlan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Atazanavir concentration in hair is the strongest predictor of outcomes on antiretroviral therapy.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2011
    Article
  11. Clinical evaluation of a dried blood spot assay for atazanavir.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2010
    Article
  12. Factors influencing lopinavir and atazanavir plasma concentration.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2010
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Monitoring therapy.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

John E RayDivision of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, Institute of Laboratory Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia. jray@stvincents.com.au
Debbie Marriott
Mark T Bloch
Andrew J McLachlan
Institute of Laboratory Animal Science · CNSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTherapeutic failure with antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a substantial issue where viral rebound, viral resistance and drug-related toxicity remain serious concerns. Drug exposure-response relationships have been described for the protease inhibitors, pharmacokinetic variability is substantial for this class of drugs and drug interactions can also alter ART exposure. Given this background we established a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service to monitor atazanavir (ATV) plasma concentrations early after the therapy was made available to treatment-experienced people infected with HIV who were managed in a clinical setting.

methodsThis was a prospective observational study which evaluated plasma samples from 110 highly treatment-experienced people with HIV using TDM and applied pharmacokinetic analysis over a five month period.

resultsATV trough concentrations exhibited substantial intersubject variability (<25-2108 microg l(-1)). A substantial number of subjects (50%,13/26) who received ATV400 mg daily had low exposure to ATV. Serum bilirubin concentrations correlated significantly with higher ATV trough concentrations (rho = 0.803; P < 0.001) and 55% (29/53) of subjects who received ATV300/100 mg RTV daily had plasma concentrations above a proposed target concentration associated with elevated bilirubin concentrations. This study confirmed low ATV exposure in eight subjects with HIV receiving ATV 400 mg daily. Reasons for low ATV exposure in this cohort include administration of interacting drugs, including a possible interaction with ritonavir, fluticasone and ATV, impaired ATV absorption secondary to suspected achlorhydria and potential interactions with colchicine and nandrolone. Viral load remained undetectable in most of these subjects with low ATV exposure.

conclusionsTDM and targeted pharmacokinetic studies should be viewed as fundamental tools in the development and clinical application of ART, to improve pharmacotherapy for people with HIV.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsAtazanavir SulfateCohort StudiesDrug MonitoringFemaleHIV InfectionsHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOligopeptidesProspective StudiesPyridinesAnti-HIV AgentsAtazanavir SulfateHIV Protease InhibitorsOligopeptidesPyridines

Identifiers

PMID16120068
PMCPMC1884776
OpenAlexW2042416176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.