ArticlePLoS computational biology2005
Functional coverage of the human genome by existing structures, structural genomics targets, and homology models.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- PTUPB, a soluble epoxide hydrolase/cyclooxygenase‑2 dual inhibitor, reduces endothelial‑to‑mesenchymal transition and improves doxorubicin‑induced vascular and cardiac toxicity.Molecular medicine reports · 2026Article
- Computational approaches for molecular characterization and structure-based functional elucidation of a hypothetical protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Genomics & informatics · 2023Article
- Network Pharmacology- and Molecular Docking-Based Identification of Potential Phytocompounds fromEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Heterogeneous Multi-Layered Network Model for Omics Data Integration and Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- Direct Binding of the Flexible C-Terminal Segment of Periaxin to β4 Integrin Suggests a Molecular Basis for CMT4F.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2019Article
- Article
- Algorithmic approaches to protein-protein interaction site prediction.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2015Article
- Knowledge-based fragment binding prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
- An association-adjusted consensus deleterious scheme to classify homozygous Mis-sense mutations for personal genome interpretation.BioData mining · 2013Article
- Quantifying the molecular origins of opposite solvent effects on protein-protein interactions.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
- Exploiting protein flexibility to predict the location of allosteric sites.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- The evolution of protein structures and structural ensembles under functional constraint.Genes · 2011Article
- Predicting protein-protein interactions on a proteome scale by matching evolutionary and structural similarities at interfaces using PRISM.Nature protocols · 2011Article
- Structure-based systems biology for analyzing off-target binding.Current opinion in structural biology · 2011Review
- The utility of geometrical and chemical restraint information extracted from predicted ligand-binding sites in protein structure refinement.Journal of structural biology · 2011Article
- A new approach to assess and predict the functional roles of proteins across all known structures.Journal of structural and functional genomics · 2011Article
- 1,000 structures and more from the MCSG.BMC structural biology · 2011Article
- SAHG, a comprehensive database of predicted structures of all human proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
- Building macromolecular assemblies by information-driven docking: introducing the HADDOCK multibody docking server.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The bias in protein structure and function space resulting from experimental limitations and targeting of particular functional classes of proteins by structural biologists has long been recognized, but never continuously quantified. Using the Enzyme Commission and the Gene Ontology classifications as a reference frame, and integrating structure data from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), target sequences from the structural genomics projects, structure homology derived from the SUPERFAMILY database, and genome annotations from Ensembl and NCBI, we provide a quantified view, both at the domain and whole-protein levels, of the current and projected coverage of protein structure and function space relative to the human genome. Protein structures currently provide at least one domain that covers 37% of the functional classes identified in the genome; whole structure coverage exists for 25% of the genome. If all the structural genomics targets were solved (twice the current number of structures in the PDB), it is estimated that structures of one domain would cover 69% of the functional classes identified and complete structure coverage would be 44%. Homology models from existing experimental structures extend the 37% coverage to 56% of the genome as single domains and 25% to 31% for complete structures. Coverage from homology models is not evenly distributed by protein family, reflecting differing degrees of sequence and structure divergence within families. While these data provide coverage, conversely, they also systematically highlight functional classes of proteins for which structures should be determined. Current key functional families without structure representation are highlighted here; updated information on the "most wanted list" that should be solved is available on a weekly basis from http://function.rcsb.org:8080/pdb/function_distribution/index.html.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.