Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16116355›Full record

ArticleMedical care2005

Rehospitalization and survival for stroke patients in managed care and traditional Medicare plans.

Maureen A Smith, Jennifer R Frytak, Jinn-Ing Liou, Michael D Finch

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maureen A SmithDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53705-2397, USA. maureensmith@wisc.edu
Jennifer R Frytak
Jinn-Ing Liou
Michael D Finch
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USOptum (United States) · US

Funding

Older Adults and Specialty Care Use in Managed CareR01AG019747 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI SMITH, MAUREEN A · 2001 to 2002
$562k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG019747NIA NIH HHS R01-AG19747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke affects more than 500,000 older persons each year in the United States, but no studies have compared older stroke patients in Medicare health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and fee-for-service (FFS) after recent changes in FFS reimbursement.

objectivesWe sought to compare utilization and outcomes after stroke in Medicare HMO and FFS.

designWe reviewed administrative data in 11 regions from Medicare and a large national health plan. SUBJECTS: We studied Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older discharged with ischemic stroke during 1998-2000, ie, 4816 HMO patients and a random sample of 4187 FFS patients from 422 hospitals. MEASURES: We measured survival, rehospitalization, length of stay, discharge destination, and warfarin use.

resultsOverall, HMO patients were younger, male, non-Caucasian, and had fewer comorbid conditions. When compared with FFS patients, HMO patients were more likely to be rehospitalized within 30 days for a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke (Adjusted Hazard Ratio = 1.45, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.14-1.83) or ill-defined conditions (eg, rehabilitation services) (2.87, 95% CI 1.85-4.46) and less likely to be rehospitalized for fluid and electrolyte disorders (0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.87) or circulatory/respiratory problems (0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.98). There were no consistent differences in 30-day mortality or in 1-year rehospitalization or mortality for 30-day survivors. HMO patients also were much less likely to be discharged to rehabilitation facilities, slightly less likely to be discharged to skilled nursing facilities and to have a shorter length of stay, and did not differ in the use of home care services or warfarin use when compared with FFS patients.

conclusionsTraditional measures of quality such as 30-day rehospitalization may not be valid when comparing HMO and FFS patients if differences might reflect an alternative service mix. Utilization of post-acute care for FFS patients appears similar to HMO patients except for discharge to rehabilitation facilities.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overConfidence IntervalsFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHealth Maintenance OrganizationsHumansMaleMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedMedicareMiddle AgedOdds RatioOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient ReadmissionProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID16116355
PMCPMC1635488
OpenAlexW2052378206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.