Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16113660›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2005

Impact of different strategies of second-line stem cell harvest on the outcome of autologous transplantation in poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilizers.

R Goterris, J C Hernández-Boluda, A Teruel, C Gómez, M J Lis, M J Terol, M Tormo, C Solano, C Arbona

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. LECT2: A pleiotropic and promising hepatokine, from bench to bedside.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

R GoterrisHematology and Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
J C Hernández-Boluda
A Teruel
C Gómez
M J Lis
M J Terol
M Tormo
C Solano
C Arbona

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal approach to obtain an adequate graft for transplantation in patients with poor peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization remains unclear. We retrospectively assessed the impact of different strategies of second-line stem cell harvest on the transplantation outcome of patients who failed PBSC mobilization in our institution. Such patients were distributed into three groups: those who proceeded to steady-state bone marrow (BM) collection (group A, n = 34); those who underwent second PBSC mobilization (group B, n = 41); those in whom no further harvesting was carried out (group C, n = 30). PBSC harvest yielded significantly more CD34+ cells than BM collection. Autologous transplantation was performed in 30, 23 and 11 patients from groups A, B and C, respectively. Engraftment data and transplantation outcome did not differ significantly between groups A and C. By contrast, group B patients had a faster neutrophil recovery, required less platelet transfusions and experienced less transplant-related morbidity, as reflected by lower antibiotics needs and shorter hospital stays. In conclusion, remobilization of PBSC constitutes an effective approach to ensure a rapid hematopoietic engraftment and a safe transplantation procedure for poor mobilizers, whereas unprimed BM harvest does not provide any clinical benefit in this setting.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell MobilizationAdultAgedAntigens, CD34Blood CellsBone Marrow CellsBone Marrow TransplantationCell CountFemaleGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHematologic NeoplasmsHumansLeukapheresisMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Blood Stem Cell TransplantationAntigens, CD34Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

Identifiers

PMID16113660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.