Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16111487›Full record

Trial reportBMC family practice2005

A randomized trial of mail vs. telephone invitation to a community-based cardiovascular health awareness program for older family practice patients [ISRCTN61739603].

Tina Karwalajtys, Janusz Kaczorowski, Larry W Chambers, Cheryl Levitt, Lisa Dolovich, Bea McDonough, Christopher Patterson, James E Williams

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC family practice, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00217334 (A Pragmatic Trial of Community Pharmacy Blood Pressure Clinics Linked With Family Medicine Practices to Improve the Monitoring and Management of High Blood Pressure Among Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00217334 nacompletednot on this map

A Pragmatic Trial of Community Pharmacy Blood Pressure Clinics Linked With Family Medicine Practices to Improve the Monitoring and Management of High Blood Pressure Among Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorHamilton Health Sciences CorporationRan2002 to 2005Enrolled28ConditionsHypertensionArmsVolunteer-led pharmacy sessions with feedback to physicians
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tina KarwalajtysDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. karwalt@mcmaster.ca
Janusz Kaczorowski
Larry W Chambers
Cheryl Levitt
Lisa Dolovich
Bea McDonough
Christopher Patterson
James E Williams

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily physicians can play an important role in encouraging patients to participate in community-based health promotion initiatives designed to supplement and enhance their in-office care. Our objectives were to determine effective approaches to invite older family practice patients to attend cardiovascular health awareness sessions in community pharmacies, and to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a program incorporating invitation by physicians and feedback to physicians.

methodsWe conducted a prospective randomized trial with 1 family physician practice and 5 community pharmacies in Dundas, Ontario. Regular patients 65 years or older (n = 235) were randomly allocated to invitation by mail or telephone to attend pharmacy cardiovascular health awareness sessions led by volunteer peer health educators. A health record review captured blood pressure status, monitoring and control. At the sessions, volunteers helped patients to measure blood pressure using in-store machines and a validated portable device (BPM-100), and recorded blood pressure readings and self-reported cardiovascular risk factors. We compared attendance rates in the mail and telephone invitation groups and explored factors potentially associated with attendance.

resultsThe 119 patients invited by mail and 116 patients contacted by telephone had a mean age of 75.7 (SD, 6.4) years and 46.8% were male. Overall, 58.3% (137/235) of invitees attended a pharmacy cardiovascular health awareness session. Patients invited by telephone were more likely to attend than those invited by mail (72.3% vs. 44.0%, OR 3.3; 95%CI 1.9-5.7; p < 0.001).

conclusionWhile the attendance in response to a telephone invitation was higher, response to a single letter was substantial. Attendance rates indicated considerable interest in community-based cardiovascular health promotion activities. A large-scale trial of a pharmacy cardiovascular health awareness program for older primary care patients is feasible.

Indexed as

Family PracticePostal ServiceTelephoneAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Pressure DeterminationCardiovascular DiseasesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansHypertensionMaleOntarioPatient Acceptance of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID16111487
PMCPMC1208877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.