ArticleFolia microbiologica2005
Application of PCR, rep-PCR and RAPD techniques for typing of Lactococcus lactis strains.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seasonal Diversity of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Artisanal Yoghurt and Their Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern.International journal of food science · 2021Article
- Selection of enhanced antimicrobial activity posing lactic acid bacteria characterised by (GTG)5-PCR fingerprinting.Journal of food science and technology · 2015Article
- Characterization of a wild, novel nisin a-producing Lactococcus strain with an L. lactis subsp. cremoris genotype and an L. lactis subsp. lactis phenotype, isolated from Greek raw milk.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2013Article
- Characterization of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis isolated from surface waters.Folia microbiologica · 2008Article
- RAPD and rep-PCR fingerprinting for characterization of Bifidobacterium species.Folia microbiologica · 2008Article
- Next-generation sequencing as an approach to dairy starter selection.Dairy science & technologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A collection of 34 lactococcal strains were characterized using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the acmA gene, and for the 16S rDNA gene, and DNA fingerprinting methods for randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and repetitive extragenic palindrome-PCR (rep-PCR). PCR experiments corroborated the genotypic identification of Lactococcus lactis strains by RAPD; rep-PCR did not distinguish between L. lactis subspecies. In some cases, phenotypic classification of L. lactis subspecies did not correlate with genotypic characterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16110920What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.