Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16110913›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2005

PCR assay for detection and differentiation of K88ab(1), K88ab(2), K88ac, and K88ad fimbrial adhesins in E. coli strains isolated from diarrheic piglets.

E Holoda, H Vu-Khac, S Andrasková, Z Chomová, A Wantrubová, M Krajnák, E Pilipcinec

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Capture efficiency of Escherichia coli in fimbriae-mediated immunoimmobilization.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2012
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

E HolodaInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, University of Veterinary Medicine, 041 81 Kosice, Slovakia.
H Vu-Khac
S Andrasková
Z Chomová
A Wantrubová
M Krajnák
E Pilipcinec
University of Veterinary Medicine in Košice · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primers were designed and prepared and conditions were determined for PCR detection and differentiation of enterotoxigenic E. coli bacterial strains isolated from diarrheic pigs. Primers K88/1 and K88/2 are 25 bp oligomers that correspond to a region of genes encoding one of serological variants of the K88 antigen (K88ab(1), K88ab(2), K88ac or K88ad). A positive result of PCR is an amplificate of 792 bp in size for K88ab and K88ad variant or 786 bp for K88ac variant. The individual serological variants of genes of the K88 antigen could be differentiated by cutting the obtained PCR amplificates by restriction endonucleases. The PCR analysis of 674 E. coli strains isolated from diarrheic pigs showed that 184 strains were K88 positive. By using restriction endonucleases the K88-positive strains were in 4 cases classified as K88ab variant, 180 as K88ac variant and none contained gene for the K88ad variant. Ninety-five % coincidence with serological examination using K88ab, K88ac and K88ad specific antibodies was shown.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, BacterialDiarrheaDNA PrimersDNA Restriction EnzymesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli ProteinsFimbriae ProteinsGenetic VariationPolymerase Chain ReactionSlovakiaSwineSwine DiseasesAntigens, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA Restriction EnzymesEscherichia coli ProteinsFimbriae ProteinsK88 antigen, E coli

Identifiers

PMID16110913
OpenAlexW2137450386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.