Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16109727›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of physiology2005

Interaction of chemoreceptor and baroreceptor reflexes by hypoxia and hypercapnia - a mechanism for promoting hypertension in obstructive sleep apnoea.

V L Cooper, S B Pearson, C M Bowker, M W Elliott, R Hainsworth

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of physiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Testing individual baroreflex responses to hypoxia-induced peripheral chemoreflex stimulation.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2020
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. The Valsalva maneuver: screening for drug-induced baroreflex dysfunction.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2009
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. CD8American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Autonomic cardiovascular control during exercise.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Real-time changes in rib cage expansion and use of abdominal mechanical stimulation in newborns: a quasi-experimental study.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2023
    Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

V L CooperInstitute for Cardiovascular Research, University of Leeds, UK. mrpvlw@leeds.ac.uk
S B Pearson
C M Bowker
M W Elliott
R Hainsworth
St James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBLeeds General Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asphyxia, which occurs during obstructive sleep apnoeic events, alters the baroreceptor reflex and this may lead to hypertension. We have recently reported that breathing an asphyxic gas resets the baroreceptor-vascular resistance reflex towards higher pressures. The present study was designed to determine whether this effect was caused by the reduced oxygen tension, which affects mainly peripheral chemoreceptors, or by the increased carbon dioxide, which acts mainly on central chemoreceptors. We studied 11 healthy volunteer subjects aged between 20 and 55 years old (6 male). The stimulus to the carotid baroreceptors was changed using graded pressures of -40 to +60 mmHg applied to a neck chamber. Responses of vascular resistance were assessed in the forearm from changes in blood pressure (Finapres) divided by brachial blood flow velocity (Doppler) and cardiac responses from the changes in RR interval and heart rate. Stimulus-response curves were defined during (i) air breathing, (ii) hypoxia (12% O(2) in N(2)), and (iii) hypercapnia (5% CO(2) in 95% O(2)). Responses during air breathing were assessed both prior to and after either hypoxia or hypercapnia. We applied a sigmoid function or third order polynomial to the curves and determined the maximal differential (equivalent to peak sensitivity) and the corresponding carotid sinus pressure (equivalent to 'set point'). Hypoxia resulted in an increase in heart rate but no significant change in mean blood pressure or vascular resistance. However, there was an increase in vascular resistance in the post-stimulus period. Hypoxia had no significant effect on baroreflex sensitivity or 'set point' for the control of RR interval, heart rate or mean arterial pressure. Peak sensitivity of the vascular resistance response to baroreceptor stimulation was significantly reduced from -2.5 +/- 0.4 units to -1.4 +/- 0.1 units (P < 0.05) and this was restored in the post-stimulus period to -2.6 +/- 0.5 units. There was no effect on 'set point'. Hypercapnia, on the other hand, resulted in a decrease in heart rate, which remained reduced in the post-stimulus period and significantly increased mean blood pressure. Baseline vascular resistance was significantly increased and then further increased in the post-control period. Like hypoxia, hypercapnia had no effect on baroreflex control of RR interval, heart rate or mean arterial pressure. There was, also no significant change in the sensitivity of the vascular resistance responses, however, 'set point' was significantly increased from 74.7 +/- 4 to 87.0 +/- 2 mmHg (P < 0.02). This was not completely restored to pre-stimulus control levels in the post-stimulus control period (82.2 +/- 3 mmHg). These results suggest that the hypoxic component of asphyxia reduces baroreceptor-vascular resistance reflex sensitivity, whilst the hypercapnic component is responsible for increasing blood pressure and reflex 'set point'. Hypercapnia appears to have a lasting effect after the removal of the stimulus. Thus the effect of both peripheral and central chemoreceptors on baroreflex function may contribute to promoting hypertension in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Indexed as

AdultAsphyxiaBaroreflexBlood PressureCarbon DioxideChemoreceptor CellsFemaleHeart RateHumansHypercapniaHypertensionHypoxiaMaleMiddle AgedOxygenSleep Apnea, ObstructiveCarbon DioxideOxygen

Identifiers

PMID16109727
PMCPMC1474745
OpenAlexW1539052190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.