Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16109160›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2005

The effect of a monetary incentive on return of a postal health and development questionnaire: a randomised trial [ISRCTN53994660].

Sara Kenyon, Katie Pike, David Jones, David Taylor, Alison Salt, Neil Marlow, Peter Brocklehurst

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  7. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara KenyonDepartment of Cancer Studies and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. oracle@le.ac.uk
Katie Pike
David Jones
David Taylor
Alison Salt
Neil Marlow
Peter Brocklehurst

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostal questionnaires are widely used to collect data in healthcare research but a poor response rate may reduce the validity and reliability of results. There was a lack of evidence available relating to use of a monetary incentive to improve the response rate in the healthcare setting.

methodsThe MRC ORACLE Children Study is assessing the health and development of nearly 9000 seven year old children whose mothers' joined the MRC ORACLE Trial. We carried out a randomised controlled trial of inclusion of monetary incentive (five pound voucher redeemable at many high street stores) with the reminder questionnaire to parents. This trial took place between April 2002 and November 2003. When the parents were sent the reminder questionnaire about their child's health and development they were randomly assigned by concealed computer-generated allocation stratified by week of birthday to receive a five pound voucher or no incentive. The population were 722 non-responders to the initial mailing of a 12-page questionnaire.

main outcome measuresDifference in response rate between the two groups.

resultsInclusion of the voucher with the reminder questionnaire resulted in a 11.7%(95% CI 4.7% to 18.6%) improvement in the response rate between the two groups.

conclusionThis improvement in response rate and hence the validity and reliability of results obtained appears to be justified ethically and financially.

Indexed as

Child WelfareHealth SurveysReimbursement, IncentiveAdultChildEnglandFemaleHumansMothersMotivationPostal ServiceReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID16109160
PMCPMC1201139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.