Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16108138›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2005

Drosophila bristles and the nature of quantitative genetic variation.

Trudy F Mackay, Richard F Lyman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Evolution of Variance Control.Trends in ecology & evolution · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Trudy F MackayDepartment of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7614, Raleigh, NC 27612, USA. trudy_mackay@ncsu.edu
Richard F Lyman
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

THEORETICAL QUANTITATIVE GENETICSP01GM045344 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI MACKAY, TRUDY F · 1991 to 2005
$7.2M
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI IN DROSOPHILAR01GM045146 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI ANHOLT, ROBERT R. H, MACKAY, TRUDY F. · 1991 to 2012
$5.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM45146NIGMS NIH HHS GM45344NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM045344NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM045146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numbers of Drosophila sensory bristles present an ideal model system to elucidate the genetic basis of variation for quantitative traits. Here, we review recent evidence that the genetic architecture of variation for bristle numbers is surprisingly complex. A substantial fraction of the Drosophila genome affects bristle number, indicating pervasive pleiotropy of genes that affect quantitative traits. Further, a large number of loci, often with sex- and environment-specific effects that are also conditional on background genotype, affect natural variation in bristle number. Despite this complexity, an understanding of the molecular basis of natural variation in bristle number is emerging from linkage disequilibrium mapping studies of individual candidate genes that affect the development of sensory bristles. We show that there is naturally segregating genetic variance for environmental plasticity of abdominal and sternopleural bristle number. For abdominal bristle number this variance can be attributed in part to an abnormal abdomen-like phenotype that resembles the phenotype of mutants defective in catecholamine biosynthesis. Dopa decarboxylase (Ddc) encodes the enzyme that catalyses the final step in the synthesis of dopamine, a major Drosophila catecholamine and neurotransmitter. We found that molecular polymorphisms at Ddc are indeed associated with variation in environmental plasticity of abdominal bristle number.

Indexed as

EnvironmentEpistasis, GeneticGenetic VariationPhenotypeQuantitative Trait, HeritableAnimalsDopa DecarboxylaseDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGenotypeHeterozygoteLinkage DisequilibriumMutationNuclear ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsSex FactorsDopa DecarboxylaseDrosophila ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPSI protein, DrosophilaRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16108138
PMCPMC1569512
OpenAlexW2101823424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.