Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16107713›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2005

Role of the mammalian RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain (CTD) nonconsensus repeats in CTD stability and cell proliferation.

Rob D Chapman, Marcus Conrad, Dirk Eick

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Germline mutation inHGG advances · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evolutionary diversity and taxon-specific modifications of the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rob D ChapmanGSF-Research Centre for Environment and Health, Institute for Clinical Molecular Biology and Tumour Genetics, Munich, Germany. rob.chapman@gsf.de
Marcus Conrad
Dirk Eick
Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The C-terminal domain (CTD) of mammalian RNA polymerase II (Pol II) consists of 52 repeats of the consensus heptapeptide YSPTSPS and links transcription to the processing of pre-mRNA. The length of the CTD and the number of repeats diverging from the consensus sequence have increased through evolution, but their functional importance remains unknown. Here, we show that the deletion of repeats 1 to 3 or 52 leads to cleavage and degradation of the CTD from Pol II in vivo. Including these repeats, however, allowed the construction of stable, synthetic CTDs. To our surprise, polymerases consisting of just consensus repeats could support normal growth and viability of cells. We conclude that all other nonconsensus CTD repeats are dispensable for the transcription and pre-mRNA processing of genes essential for proliferation.

Indexed as

MammalsRepetitive Sequences, Amino AcidAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCell ProliferationConsensus SequenceEnzyme StabilityGene DeletionHeLa CellsHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMolecular Sequence DataMutationProtein Structure, TertiaryRNA, MessengerRNA Polymerase IIRNA, MessengerRNA Polymerase II

Identifiers

PMID16107713
PMCPMC1190292
OpenAlexW2141004015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.