ArticleBMC genetics2005
Tests for the replication of an association between Egfr and natural variation in Drosophila melanogaster wing morphology.
Article in BMC genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diversity in the internal functional feeding elements of sympatric morphs of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus).PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Differential gene expression during early development in recently evolved and sympatric Arctic charr morphs.PeerJ · 2018Article
- Natural Genetic Variation and Candidate Genes for Morphological Traits in Drosophila melanogaster.PloS one · 2016Article
- The developmental transcriptome of contrasting Arctic charr (F1000Research · 2015Article
- Differentiation at the MHCIIα and Cath2 loci in sympatric Salvelinus alpinus resource morphs in Lake Thingvallavatn.PloS one · 2013Article
- The genomics of adaptation.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2012Article
- A test for selection employing quantitative trait locus and mutation accumulation data.Genetics · 2012Article
- The QTN program and the alleles that matter for evolution: all that's gold does not glitter.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2012Article
- Joint estimates of quantitative trait locus effect and frequency using synthetic recombinant populations of Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics · 2007Article
- How repeatable are associations between polymorphisms in achaete-scute and bristle number variation in Drosophila?Genetics · 2007Article
- Genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster resistance to infection: a comparison across bacteria.Genetics · 2006Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuantitative differences between individuals stem from a combination of genetic and environmental factors, with the heritable variation being shaped by evolutionary forces. Drosophila wing shape has emerged as an attractive system for genetic dissection of multi-dimensional traits. We utilize several experimental genetic methods to validation of the contribution of several polymorphisms in the Epidermal growth factor receptor (Egfr) gene to wing shape and size, that were previously mapped in populations of Drosophila melanogaster from North Carolina (NC) and California (CA). This re-evaluation utilized different genetic testcrosses to generate heterozygous individuals with a variety of genetic backgrounds as well as sampling of new alleles from Kenyan stocks.
resultsOnly one variant, in the Egfr promoter, had replicable effects in all new experiments. However, expanded genotyping of the initial sample of inbred lines rendered the association non-significant in the CA population, while it persisted in the NC sample, suggesting population specific modification of the quantitative trait nucleotide QTN effect.
conclusionDissection of quantitative trait variation to the nucleotide level can identify sites with replicable effects as small as one percent of the segregating genetic variation. However, the testcross approach to validate QTNs is both labor intensive and time-consuming, and is probably less useful than resampling of large independent sets of outbred individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.