Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16099877›Full record

ArticleBlood2005

Long-term outcome of individuals with pure red cell aplasia and antierythropoietin antibodies in patients treated with recombinant epoetin: a follow-up report from the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) Project.

Charles L Bennett, Denis Cournoyer, Kenneth R Carson, Jerome Rossert, Stefano Luminari, Andrew M Evens, Francesco Locatelli, Steven M Belknap, June M McKoy, E Alison Lyons and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Pure red cell aplasia induced by epoetin zeta.Clinical kidney journal · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Anemia in children with chronic kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charles L BennettMidWest Center for Health Services Research and Policy Studies, VA Chicago Healthcare System, Chicago, IL, USA. cbenne@northwestern.edu
Denis Cournoyer
Kenneth R Carson
Jerome Rossert
Stefano Luminari
Andrew M Evens
Francesco Locatelli
Steven M Belknap
June M McKoy
E Alison Lyons
Benjamin Kim
Rishi Sharma
Stacey Costello
Edwin B Toffelmire
George A Wells
Hans A Messner
Paul R Yarnold
Steven M Trifilio
Dennis W Raisch
Timothy M Kuzel
Allen Nissenson
Lay-Cheng Lim
Martin S Tallman
Nicole Casadevall
Northwestern Medicine · US

Funding

Tumor Environment and Metastasis (TEAM) Research ProgramP30CA060553 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Daniela E Matei · 1993 to 2026
$153.9M
Research for Adverse Drug-Events And Reports (RADAR)R01CA102713 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WEST, DENNIS PAUL · 2003 to 2010
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA102713-01NCI NIH HHS P 30 CA60553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its introduction in 1988, recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) has been standard treatment for patients with anemia due to chronic kidney disease. From 1998 to 2004, nearly 200 epoetin-treated persons with chronic kidney disease developed antibodies to epoetin, resulting in pure red cell aplasia (PRCA). The majority of these patients received Eprex, an epoetin alfa product marketed exclusively outside the United States. Herein, we report on the long-term outcome of these individuals. For 170 chronic kidney disease patients who developed epoetin-associated PRCA and had 3 months or more follow-up information available, case reports from the Food and Drug Administration and epoetin manufacturers were reviewed for information on clinical characteristics of the patients, immunosuppressive treatments, epoetin responsiveness, and hematologic recovery. Overall, 64% of the PRCA patients received immunosuppressive therapy, including 19 who also underwent a renal transplantation. Thirty-seven percent experienced a hematologic recovery, with higher hematologic recovery rates among PRCA patients who received immunosuppressive therapy (57% vs 2%, P < .001). Among 34 patients who received epoetin after the onset of PRCA, 56% regained epoetin responsiveness. The highest rates of epoetin responsiveness were observed among persons whose antierythropoietin antibodies were undetectable when epoetin was administered (89%). Among chronic kidney disease patients with epoetin-associated PRCA, epoetin discontinuation and immunosuppressive therapy or renal transplantation is necessary for hematologic recovery. Reinitiation of epoetin therapy among individuals could be considered if antierythropoietin antibodies are undetectable.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesChronic DiseaseEpoetin AlfaErythropoietinFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHematinicsHumansImmunosuppression TherapyKidney DiseasesKidney TransplantationMaleRecombinant ProteinsRed-Cell Aplasia, PureRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAutoantibodiesEpoetin AlfaErythropoietinHematinicsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16099877
PMCPMC1895064
OpenAlexW2122695869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.