Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16098155›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2005

Patients' priorities concerning health research: the case of asthma and COPD research in the Netherlands.

J Francisca Caron-Flinterman, Jacqueline E W Broerse, Julia Teerling, Joske F G Bunders

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03432143 (Community Members as Reviewers of Medical Journal Manuscripts), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03432143 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Community Members as Reviewers of Medical Journal Manuscripts

TypeinterventionalSponsorMetroHealth Medical CenterRan2018 to 2021Enrolled568ConditionsPeer Review, ResearchArmsCommunity Reviewers
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Priorities of patients, caregivers and health-care professionals for health research - A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Personalized Priority and Progress Questionnaire (PPPQ): A personalized instrument for quality of life and self-management for use in clinical trials and practice.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Priorities in Pulmonary Rehabilitation Research: The Patient Perspective.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Evaluation of patient engagement in medicine development: A multi-stakeholder framework with metrics.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluating the "return on patient engagement initiatives" in medicines research and development: A literature review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J Francisca Caron-FlintermanAthena Institute for Research on Communication and Innovation in Health and Life Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. francisca.caron.flinterman@falw.vu.nl
Jacqueline E W Broerse
Julia Teerling
Joske F G Bunders
Candid · USMarymount University · USVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough patients are increasingly involved in agenda setting within specific fields of health research, they rarely participate in decision-making on the entire breadth of health research, including biomedical research. This might be attributable to a widely held view that patients are incapable of adequate research prioritization due to a lack of relevant knowledge, a failure to look beyond their own individual problems or an inability to objectively consider long-term targets.

aimsBy conducting transparent and structured consultations with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients regarding their health research priorities, we aim to assess the ability of patients to prioritize research in a well-argued way.

methodsPatients were consulted through seven focus groups, a feedback meeting, and a questionnaire. The focus groups and the feedback meeting aimed to explore the entire breadth of patients' problems experienced in relation to their diseases, while the questionnaire aimed to investigate patients' prioritization of possible research targets focused on solving these problems.

resultsThe focus groups produced a wide range of problems, including those related to health-care organization, social environment, therapy and costs. In terms of research prioritization, patients focused primarily on biomedical issues, particularly aetiology, co-morbidity and effective medication.

conclusionsThe consultation procedure successfully elicited patients' research priorities including the underlying arguments. Our results indicate that asthma and COPD patients are capable of research prioritization in a well-argued way and that they highly value biomedical research. Furthermore, as they prioritized some research topics that are not covered by current Dutch research programmes, we argue that patient participation can broaden research agenda setting.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PrioritiesPatient ParticipationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionAsthmaBiomedical ResearchFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlands

Identifiers

PMID16098155
PMCPMC5060294
OpenAlexW2119934573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.