Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16098150›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2005

From rhetoric to reality: including patient voices in supportive cancer care planning.

Sara K Tedford Gold, Julia Abelson, Cathy A Charles

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. "Part of the Team": Mapping the outcomes of training patients for new roles in health research and planning.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Does implementing a development plan for user participation in a mental hospital change patients' experience? A non-randomized controlled study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  6. Aiming for inclusion: a case study of motivations for involvement in mental health-care governance by ethnic minority users.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  7. From awareness to involvement? A qualitative study of respiratory patients' awareness of health service change.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011
    Article
  8. Service user involvement in cancer care: the impact on service users.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011
    Article
  9. Are elected health boards an effective mechanism for public participation in health service governance?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara K Tedford GoldCentre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. tedford@mcmaster.ca
Julia Abelson
Cathy A Charles
McMaster University · CAMcMaster University Medical Centre · CAPolicy Analysis (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the extent and manner of patient participation in the planning of regional supportive care networks throughout the province of Ontario. We consider the disconnect between the rhetoric and reality of patient involvement in network planning and co-ordination. CONTEXT: In 1997, the Province of Ontario, Canada, established a new, regionalized cancer care system. By transferring responsibility to the regional level and to networks, the architects of the new provincial system hoped to broaden participation in decision making and to enhance the responsiveness of decisions to communities. RESEARCH APPROACH: Through a qualitative, multiple case study approach we evaluated the processes of involving patients in network development. In-depth, semi-structured interviews and document analysis were complemented by observations of provincial meetings, regional council and network meetings.

resultsThe network development processes in the three case study regions reveal a significant gap between intentions to involve patients in health planning and their actual involvement. This gap can be explained by: (i) a lack of clear direction regarding networks and patient participation in these networks; (ii) the dominance of regional cancer centres in network planning activities; and, (iii) the emergence of competing provincial priorities. DISCUSSION: These three trends expose the complexity of the notion of public participation and how it is embedded in social and political contexts. The failed attempt at involving patients in health planning efforts is the result of benign neglect of public participation intents and the social and political contexts in which public and patient participation is meant to occur.

Indexed as

Cancer Care FacilitiesCommunity Health PlanningCommunity NetworksDecision Making, OrganizationalHumansInterviews as TopicNeoplasmsOntarioOrganizational Case StudiesPatient ParticipationRegional Medical Programs

Identifiers

PMID16098150
PMCPMC5060302
OpenAlexW2055456016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.