Trial reportPharmacy world & science : PWS2005
When fever, paracetamol? Theory and practice in a paediatric outpatient clinic.
Trial report in Pharmacy world & science : PWS, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Approach to fever in children among final-year nursing students: a multicenter survey.BMC nursing · 2023Article
- Paracetamol prescribing in primary care: too little and too much?British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011Article
- Managing childhood fever and pain--the comfort loop.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine how medical and nursing staff treat feverish children and compare the findings with their theoretical knowledge, evaluating how they might contribute to fever phobia in parents.
settingPaediatric Emergency Department.
methodIn the first step, we analysed prospectively the files of all children having consulted the Paediatric Emergency Department with a history of fever or of body temperature above 38 degrees C during a 2-week period. The second step consisted of evaluating knowledge and perception of fever of doctors and nurses using a questionnaire.
main outcome measuresProspective study: final diagnosis (viral, non- invasive bacterial disorders, invasive bacterial disorders), site of measurement and average temperature. Evaluation of theoretical knowledge: definition of fever, site of measurement, evaluation of the child's clinical state, antipyretic drug choice.
resultsA total of 114 children under 5 years of age were enrolled and 24 caregivers (12 doctors, 12 nurses, 90 of the staff) responded to the questionnaire. The results showed good consistency in theoretical knowledge, but an excessive fear about cerebral damage was also shown by doctors. This belief likely contributes to the transmission of fever phobia to parents. In contrast, analysis of children management showed that fever was often under-treated, especially by nurses and even more so by parents. Paracetamol remained the first-line antipyretic drug yet was often administered in insufficient doses. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were seldom used, except by parents (16 of all the children). Contrary to literature, the favourite route of administration was the rectal one. Physical methods like sponging were largely used by nurses, despite the uncertainties in their real effectiveness and their known side-effects.
conclusionOur study showed that the management of feverish children was globally correct in the Paediatric Emergency Department, but several improvement measures have been taken (e.g. tables of normal and abnormal ranges of temperature, recommended temperature measurement techniques, dosage regimen of antipyretic drugs, guidelines to parents), justifying the implementation of a pharmaceutical follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.