Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16096878›Full record

ArticlePharmacy world & science : PWS2005

Cost-containment as part of pharmaceutical policy.

Anna Birna Almarsdóttir, Janine M Traulsen

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy world & science : PWS, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An Inventory Model for Deteriorating Drugs with Stochastic Lead Time.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  2. Pharmaceutical policy and the pharmacy profession.Pharmacy world & science : PWS · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anna Birna AlmarsdóttirAL-BAS Pharmaceutical Consultants Ltd., University of Iceland, Hagi, Hofsvallagata 53, IS-107, Reykjavík, Iceland, annaba@hi.is
Janine M Traulsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article the authors provide insight into the basis for price setting of medicines, the increasing pharmaceutical budgets in the past decades, and the measures governments and insures have taken to curb rising pharmaceutical costs. Four reasons are out lined for the fact that medicines are by some considered expensivey: 1) there are fundamental differences between medicines and other consumer products; 2) medicines are technology requiring an inordinate amount of research and development; 3) medicines are developed, manufactured, and distributed according to strict regulatory requirements; 4) medicines are most often selected by a physician for a specific patient and reimbursed in whole or in party by a third-party insurer or the state. Pharmaceuticals mean share of GDP has been 1.2% in OECD countries in recent decades. Pharmaceuticals accounted for 15.4% of total health expenditure, with public spending about half of this amount. Since 1970, the average share of GDP for pharmaceuticals in most countries has increased 1.5% more per year than GDP growth. Four types of strategies to curb rising Pharmaceuticals costs are described and a taxonomy of strategies provided These are:1)price and profit controls; 2) reimbursement system charges; 3) other fiscal measures; 4) quality measures. Pharmaceuticals policy has suffered from the pervasive misunderstanding that drugs are like any other commodity; resulting in policy makers viewing pharmaceuticals expenditures without thinking about drugs in their proper content of health care. The authors conclude by advocating a balanced approach to policymaking in a environment of rising pharmaceuticals costs.

Indexed as

Cost ControlEconomics, PharmaceuticalOrganizational PolicyPharmacy AdministrationDrug CostsHumansQuality Assurance, Health CareReimbursement Mechanisms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.