Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16096784›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2006

Kindling modifies morphine, cocaine and ethanol place preference.

Axel Becker, Marco Schmitz, Gisela Grecksch

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Axel BeckerInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Faculty of Medicine, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany. axel.becker@medizin.uni-magdeburg.de
Marco Schmitz
Gisela Grecksch
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brailowsky and Garcia (1999) proposed the existence of a relationship between epilepsy and addiction. To prove this hypothesis, pentylenetetrazol kindled rats were tested in the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm for their reaction to various addictive drugs with different modes of action (morphine, cocaine and ethanol). In separate experiments, locomotor activity and body temperature after application of the same drugs were tested in kindled and non-kindled rats. In the CPP experiment there were significant differences between both groups of rats. Non-kindled animals showed place preference to morphine (5.0 mg/kg) or cocaine (20.0 mg/kg). This reaction was abolished in the kindled rats. Moreover, control rats demonstrated aversion to 2.0 g/kg ethanol. However, ethanol aversion was not detectable in kindled rats. Moreover, there was no difference between non-kindled and kindled rats in locomotor activity and body temperature after morphine (1.0 and 5.0 mg/kg), cocaine (10.0 and 20.0 mg/kg), or ethanol (0.5 and 2.0 g/kg) application. This suggests alterations in reward systems as a consequence of kindling. It is hypothesised that GABAergic neurones in the ventral tegmental area might play a major role in the alterations found.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBody TemperatureCentral Nervous System DepressantsCocaineConditioning, OperantConvulsantsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrinkingDrug InteractionsEthanolKindling, NeurologicMaleMorphineMotor ActivityNarcoticsCentral Nervous System DepressantsCocaineConvulsantsEthanolMorphineNarcoticsPentylenetetrazoleSucrose

Identifiers

PMID16096784
OpenAlexW2158589650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.