Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16095527›Full record

ReviewTheoretical biology & medical modelling2005

Three subsets of sequence complexity and their relevance to biopolymeric information.

David L Abel, Jack T Trevors

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Theoretical biology & medical modelling, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Foldamer hypothesis for the growth and sequence differentiation of prebiotic polymers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Is life unique?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2011
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The Universal Plausibility Metric (UPM) & Principle (UPP).Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2009
    Article
  9. The capabilities of chaos and complexity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2009
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Measuring the functional sequence complexity of proteins.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David L AbelThe Gene Emergence Project, The Origin-of-Life Foundation, Inc., Greenbelt, MD 20770-1610, USA. life@us.net
Jack T Trevors

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic algorithms instruct sophisticated biological organization. Three qualitative kinds of sequence complexity exist: random (RSC), ordered (OSC), and functional (FSC). FSC alone provides algorithmic instruction. Random and Ordered Sequence Complexities lie at opposite ends of the same bi-directional sequence complexity vector. Randomness in sequence space is defined by a lack of Kolmogorov algorithmic compressibility. A sequence is compressible because it contains redundant order and patterns. Law-like cause-and-effect determinism produces highly compressible order. Such forced ordering precludes both information retention and freedom of selection so critical to algorithmic programming and control. Functional Sequence Complexity requires this added programming dimension of uncoerced selection at successive decision nodes in the string. Shannon information theory measures the relative degrees of RSC and OSC. Shannon information theory cannot measure FSC. FSC is invariably associated with all forms of complex biofunction, including biochemical pathways, cycles, positive and negative feedback regulation, and homeostatic metabolism. The algorithmic programming of FSC, not merely its aperiodicity, accounts for biological organization. No empirical evidence exists of either RSC of OSC ever having produced a single instance of sophisticated biological organization. Organization invariably manifests FSC rather than successive random events (RSC) or low-informational self-ordering phenomena (OSC).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceComputational BiologyComputersGeneticsInformation TheoryModels, GeneticPattern Recognition, AutomatedPolymersSequence AlignmentSoftwareStochastic ProcessesPolymers

Identifiers

PMID16095527
PMCPMC1208958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.