ArticleNucleic acids research2005
GANA--a genetic algorithm for NMR backbone resonance assignment.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- NMR assignments of sparsely labeled proteins using a genetic algorithm.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2017Article
- Median Modified Wiener Filter for nonlinear adaptive spatial denoising of protein NMR multidimensional spectra.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- An automated framework for NMR resonance assignment through simultaneous slice picking and spin system forming.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2014Article
- Advances in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance for Drug Discovery.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2009Article
- Highly automated protein backbone resonance assignment within a few hours: the "BATCH" strategy and software package.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2009Article
- Probabilistic interaction network of evidence algorithm and its application to complete labeling of peak lists from protein NMR spectroscopy.PLoS computational biology · 2009Article
- Automated assignment of NMR chemical shifts using peak-particle dynamics simulation with the DYNASSIGN algorithm.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2009Article
- Automated structure determination from NMR spectra.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2009Review
- Automatic assignment of protein backbone resonances by direct spectrum inspection in targeted acquisition of NMR data.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2008Article
- Graphical interpretation of Boolean operators for protein NMR assignments.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2008Article
- Automated sequence-specific protein NMR assignment using the memetic algorithm MATCH.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2008Article
- A genetic algorithm-based, hybrid machine learning approach to model selection.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
NMR data from different experiments often contain errors; thus, automated backbone resonance assignment is a very challenging issue. In this paper, we present a method called GANA that uses a genetic algorithm to automatically perform backbone resonance assignment with a high degree of precision and recall. Precision is the number of correctly assigned residues divided by the number of assigned residues, and recall is the number of correctly assigned residues divided by the number of residues with known human curated answers. GANA takes spin systems as input data and uses two data structures, candidate lists and adjacency lists, to assign the spin systems to each amino acid of a target protein. Using GANA, almost all spin systems can be mapped correctly onto a target protein, even if the data are noisy. We use the BioMagResBank (BMRB) dataset (901 proteins) to test the performance of GANA. To evaluate the robustness of GANA, we generate four additional datasets from the BMRB dataset to simulate data errors of false positives, false negatives and linking errors. We also use a combination of these three error types to examine the fault tolerance of our method. The average precision rates of GANA on BMRB and the four simulated test cases are 99.61, 99.55, 99.34, 99.35 and 98.60%, respectively. The average recall rates of GANA on BMRB and the four simulated test cases are 99.26, 99.19, 98.85, 98.87 and 97.78%, respectively. We also test GANA on two real wet-lab datasets, hbSBD and hbLBD. The precision and recall rates of GANA on hbSBD are 95.12 and 92.86%, respectively, and those of hbLBD are 100 and 97.40%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.