Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16093396›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2005

Cholinergic suppression of KCNQ channel currents enhances excitability of striatal medium spiny neurons.

Weixing Shen, Susan E Hamilton, Neil M Nathanson, D James Surmeier

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 236 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Striatal cholinergic interneurons exhibit compartment-specific anatomical and functional organization in the mouse.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Dual cholinergic mechanisms for sculpting striatal dopamine in vivo.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Weixing ShenDepartment of Physiology, Institute for Neuroscience, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
Susan E Hamilton
Neil M Nathanson
D James Surmeier
University of Washington · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

DOPAMINERGIC AND MUSCARINIC SIGNALING IN THE STRIATUMR37NS034696 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DALTON JAMES SURMEIER · 2001 to 2026
$7.3M
Dopaminergic and Muscarinic Signaling in the StriatumR01NS034696 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI SURMEIER, DALTON JAMES · 1996 to 2018
$4.3M
MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF NEURAL MUSCARINIC RECEPTORSR01NS026920 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NATHANSON, NEIL MARC · 1989 to 2005
$1.8M
NINDS NIH HHS NS 26920NINDS NIH HHS NS 34696NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS026920NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS034696NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS034696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to glutamatergic synaptic drive, striatal medium spiny neurons in vivo transition to a depolarized "up state" near spike threshold. In the up state, medium spiny neurons either depolarize enough to spike or remain below spike threshold and are silent before returning to the hyperpolarized "down state." Previous work has suggested that subthreshold K+ channel currents were responsible for this dichotomous behavior, but the channels giving rise to the current and the factors determining its engagement have been a mystery. To move toward resolution of these questions, perforated-patch recordings from medium spiny neurons in tissue slices were performed. K+ channels with pharmacological and kinetic features of KCNQ channels potently regulated spiking at up-state potentials. Single-cell reverse transcriptase-PCR confirmed the expression of KCNQ2, KCNQ3, and KCNQ5 mRNAs in medium spiny neurons. KCNQ channel currents in these cells were potently reduced by M1 muscarinic receptors, because the effects of carbachol were blocked by M1 receptor antagonists and lost in neurons lacking M1 receptors. Reversal of the modulation was blocked by a phosphoinositol 4-kinase inhibitor, indicating a requirement for phosphotidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate resynthesis for recovery. Inhibition of protein kinase C reduced the efficacy of the muscarinic modulation. Finally, acceleration of cholinergic interneuron spiking with 4-aminopyridine mimicked the effects of exogenous agonist application. Together, these results show that KCNQ channels are potent regulators of the excitability of medium spiny neurons at up-state potentials, and they are modulated by intrastriatal cholinergic interneurons, providing a mechanistic explanation for variability in spiking during up states seen in vivo.

Indexed as

4-AminopyridineAnimalsCorpus StriatumElectric ConductivityElectrophysiologyFemaleInterneuronsIn Vitro TechniquesIon Channel GatingKCNQ2 Potassium ChannelKCNQ3 Potassium ChannelKCNQ Potassium ChannelsMaleMiceMice, KnockoutNeurons4-AminopyridineKCNQ2 Potassium ChannelKCNQ3 Potassium ChannelKCNQ Potassium ChannelsPhosphatidylinositol 4,5-DiphosphatePotassium Channel BlockersProtein Kinase CReceptor, Muscarinic M1

Identifiers

PMID16093396
PMCPMC6725301
OpenAlexW2036366633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.