Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16091223›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2004

HIV accessory proteins and surviving the host cell.

Jenny L Anderson, Thomas J Hope

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Manipulation of the cell cycle by HIV-1.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Protein intrinsic disorder as a flexible armor and a weapon of HIV-1.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2012
    Review
  10. Tetherin and its viral antagonists.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2011
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jenny L AndersonDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. thope@uic.edu
Thomas J Hope

Funding

INTRACELLULAR TRAFFICKING OF HIV-1 PARTICLESR01AI047770 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI HOPE, THOMAS · 2000 to 2010
$2.9M
Intracellular Trafficking of HIV-1 ParticlesR56AI047770 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI HOPE, THOMAS · 2005 to 2005
$336k
NIAID NIH HHS AI 47770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus generates the accessory proteins Nef, viral infectivity factor (Vif), viral protein R, and viral protein U or viral protein X during viral replication in host cells. Although the significance of these accessory proteins is often lost in vitro, they are essential for viral pathogenesis in vivo. Therefore, these proteins have much potential as antiviral targets. Recent data reveal Vif perturbs an ill-defined antiviral pathway in host cells allowing HIV replication. These data highlight a common feature among HIV accessory proteins in manipulating the host to aid viral pathogenesis. Therefore, these new insights into Vif and other HIV accessory proteins are reviewed, emphasizing host cell interactions and new targets for therapeutic intervention.

Indexed as

HIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansViral InterferenceViral ProteinsVirus ReplicationViral Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.