ArticleBMC genomics2005
Cross genome phylogenetic analysis of human and Drosophila G protein-coupled receptors: application to functional annotation of orphan receptors.
Article in BMC genomics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Orphan G protein-coupled receptors: the ongoing search for a home.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Genome-Wide Identification of G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Ciliated Eukaryotes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Delineating Purinergic Signaling inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- ADGRL4/ELTD1 is a highly conserved angiogenesis-associated orphan adhesion GPCR that emerged with the first vertebrates and comprises 3 evolutionary variants.BMC evolutionary biology · 2019Article
- The chemokine MCP-1 (CCL2) in the host interaction with cancer: a foe or ally?Cellular & molecular immunology · 2018Review
- Article
- Melatonin increases the regularity of cardiac rhythmicity in the Drosophila heart in both wild-type and strains bearing pathogenic mutations.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2017Article
- Finding their way: themes in germ cell migration.Current opinion in cell biology · 2016Review
- Apela Regulates Fluid Homeostasis by Binding to the APJ Receptor to Activate Gi Signaling.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2015Article
- Suppression of insulin production and secretion by a decretin hormone.Cell metabolism · 2015Article
- Differential Effects of Tissue-Specific Deletion of BOSS on Feeding Behaviors and Energy Metabolism.PloS one · 2015Article
- Identification of G protein-coupled receptors in Schistosoma haematobium and S. mansoni by comparative genomics.Parasites & vectors · 2014Article
- DOR - a Database of Olfactory Receptors - Integrated Repository for Sequence and Secondary Structural Information of Olfactory Receptors in Selected Eukaryotic Genomes.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2014Article
- Article
- Identification of novel arthropod vector G protein-coupled receptors.Parasites & vectors · 2013Article
- Phylogenetic investigation of Peptide hormone and growth factor receptors in five dipteran genomes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2013Article
- More than two decades of research on insect neuropeptide GPCRs: an overview.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2012Article
- Cross-Genome Clustering of Human and C. elegans G-Protein Coupled Receptors.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2012Article
- Molecular Modelling of Oligomeric States of DmOR83b, an Olfactory Receptor in D. Melanogaster.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2012Article
- The repertoire of G protein-coupled receptors in the human parasite Schistosoma mansoni and the model organism Schmidtea mediterranea.BMC genomics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe cell-membrane G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are one of the largest known superfamilies and are the main focus of intense pharmaceutical research due to their key role in cell physiology and disease. A large number of putative GPCRs are 'orphans' with no identified natural ligands. The first step in understanding the function of orphan GPCRs is to identify their ligands. Phylogenetic clustering methods were used to elucidate the chemical nature of receptor ligands, which led to the identification of natural ligands for many orphan receptors. We have clustered human and Drosophila receptors with known ligands and orphans through cross genome phylogenetic analysis and hypothesized higher relationship of co-clustered members that would ease ligand identification, as related receptors share ligands with similar structure or class.
resultsCross-genome phylogenetic analyses were performed to identify eight major groups of GPCRs dividing them into 32 clusters of 371 human and 113 Drosophila proteins (excluding olfactory, taste and gustatory receptors) and reveal unexpected levels of evolutionary conservation across human and Drosophila GPCRs. We also observe that members of human chemokine receptors, involved in immune response, and most of nucleotide-lipid receptors (except opsins) do not have counterparts in Drosophila. Similarly, a group of Drosophila GPCRs (methuselah receptors), associated in aging, is not present in humans.
conclusionOur analysis suggests ligand class association to 52 unknown Drosophila receptors and 95 unknown human GPCRs. A higher level of phylogenetic organization was revealed in which clusters with common domain architecture or cellular localization or ligand structure or chemistry or a shared function are evident across human and Drosophila genomes. Such analyses will prove valuable for identifying the natural ligands of Drosophila and human orphan receptors that can lead to a better understanding of physiological and pathological roles of these receptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.