Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16088395›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2005

Microsatellite and AFLP markers in the Prunus persica [L. (Batsch)]xP. ferganensis BC(1)linkage map: saturation and coverage improvement.

I Verde, M Lauria, M T Dettori, E Vendramin, C Balconi, S Micali, Y Wang, M T Marrazzo, G Cipriani, H Hartings and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Construction of a reference molecular linkage map of globe artichoke (Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus).TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2009
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

I VerdeIstituto Sperimentale per la Frutticoltura (CRA), Via di Fioranello 52, Ciampino Aeroporto, 00040 Rome, Italy. ignazio.verde@entecra.it
M Lauria
M T Dettori
E Vendramin
C Balconi
S Micali
Y Wang
M T Marrazzo
G Cipriani
H Hartings
R Testolin
A G Abbott
M Motto
R Quarta

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A set of 146 single sequence repeats (SSRs) and 14 amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) primer combinations were used to enrich a previously developed linkage map obtained from a (Prunus persicaxP. ferganensis)xP. persica BC(1) progeny. Forty-one SSR primer pairs gave polymorphic patterns detecting 42 loci. The restriction/selective primer AFLP combinations produced a total of 79 segregating fragments. The resulting map is composed of 216 loci covering 665 cM with an average distance of 3.1 cM. Novel regions were covered by the newly mapped loci for a total of 159 cM. Eight linkage groups were assembled instead of the earlier 10 as two small groups (G1a and G8b), previously independent, were joined to their respective major groups (G1b and G8a). Several gaps were also reduced resulting in an improved saturation of the map. Twelve gaps >or=10 cm are still present. A comparative analysis against the Prunus reference map (71 anchor loci) pointed out an almost complete synteny and colinearity. Six loci were not syntenic and only two were not colinear. Genetic distances were significantly longer in our map than in the reference one.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingHybridization, GeneticDNA PrimersMicrosatellite RepeatsNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthPrunusDNA Primers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.