Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16087739›Full record

ArticleEukaryotic cell2005

Genomewide identification of Sko1 target promoters reveals a regulatory network that operates in response to osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Markus Proft, Francis D Gibbons, Matthew Copeland, Frederick P Roth, Kevin Struhl

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eukaryotic cell, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genetic Interactions BetweenFrontiers in fungal biology · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Functions ofPeerJ · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Markus ProftDepartment Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Francis D Gibbons
Matthew Copeland
Frederick P Roth
Kevin Struhl
Harvard University · US

Funding

MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF YEAST TRANSCRIPTIONAL INITIATIONR01GM030186 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI STRUHL, KEVIN · 1985 to 2018
$13.6M
MECHANISMS OF YEAST TRANSCRIPTIONAL INITITATIONR37GM030186 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI STRUHL, KEVIN · 1993 to 2002
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM30186NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030186NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM030186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the ATF/CREB transcription factor Sko1 (Acr1) regulates the expression of genes induced by osmotic stress under the control of the high osmolarity glycerol (HOG) mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. By combining chromatin immunoprecipitation and microarrays containing essentially all intergenic regions, we estimate that yeast cells contain approximately 40 Sko1 target promoters in vivo; 20 Sko1 target promoters were validated by direct analysis of individual loci. The ATF/CREB consensus sequence is not statistically overrepresented in confirmed Sko1 target promoters, although some sites are evolutionarily conserved among related yeast species, suggesting that they are functionally important in vivo. These observations suggest that Sko1 association in vivo is affected by factors beyond the protein-DNA interaction defined in vitro. Sko1 binds a number of promoters for genes directly involved in defense functions that relieve osmotic stress. In addition, Sko1 binds to the promoters of genes encoding transcription factors, including Msn2, Mot3, Rox1, Mga1, and Gat2. Stress-induced expression of MSN2, MOT3, and MGA1 is diminished in sko1 mutant cells, while transcriptional regulation of ROX1 seems to be unaffected. Lastly, Sko1 targets PTP3, which encodes a phosphatase that negatively regulates Hog1 kinase activity, and Sko1 is required for osmotic induction of PTP3 expression. Taken together our results suggest that Sko1 operates a transcriptional network upon osmotic stress, which involves other specific transcription factors and a phosphatase that regulates the key component of the signal transduction pathway.

Indexed as

Osmotic PressureBase SequenceBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNA-Binding ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesModels, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11Protein Tyrosine PhosphatasesRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidTranscription FactorsBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsHOG1 protein, S cerevisiaeIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11Protein Tyrosine PhosphatasesRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSKO1 protein, S cerevisiaeTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID16087739
PMCPMC1214534
OpenAlexW2109055097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.