ArticleThe Biochemical journal2005
Distinct structure and activity recoveries reveal differences in metal binding between mammalian and Escherichia coli alkaline phosphatases.
Article in The Biochemical journal, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elucidation and control of low and high active populations of alkaline phosphatase molecules for quantitative digital bioassay.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Article
- Low Level Laser Therapy With an 810-nm Diode Laser Affects the Proliferation and Differentiation of Premature Osteoblasts and Human Gingival FibroblastsJournal of lasers in medical sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The amino acids involved in the coordination of two Zn2+ ions and one Mg2+ ion in the active site are well conserved from EAP (Escherichia coli alkaline phosphatase) to BIAP (bovine intestinal alkaline phosphatase), whereas most of their surrounding residues are different. To verify the consequences of this heterology on their specific activities, we compared the activity and structure recoveries of the metal-free forms (apo) of EAP and of BIAP. In the present study, we found that although the sensitivities of EAP and BIAP to ions remained similar, significant differences in dimeric structure stability of apo-enzymes were observed between EAP and BIAP, as well as in the kinetics of their activity and secondary structure recoveries. After mild chelation inactive apo-EAP was monomeric under mild denaturing conditions, whereas inactive apo-BIAP remained dimeric, indicating that the monomer-monomer contact was stronger in the mammalian enzyme. Dimeric apo-EAP (0.45 microM, corresponding to 4 units/ml) recovered approx. 80% of its initial activity after 3 min incubation in an optimal recovery medium containing 5 microM Zn2+ and 5 mM Mg2+, whereas dimeric apo-BIAP (0.016 microM, corresponding to 4 units/ml) recovered 80% of its native activity after 6 h incubation in an optimal recovery medium containing 0.5 microM Zn2+ and 5 mM Mg2+. Small and different secondary structure changes were also observed during activity recoveries of apo-BIAP and apo-EAP, which were not in parallel with the activity recoveries, suggesting that distinct and subtle structural changes are required for their optimal activity recoveries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.